This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Users' and Patients' Needs for Mental Health Services (403) Theme issue 2019: The Digital Therapeutic Alliance (6) Digital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (1515) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (852) Methods and New Tools in Mental Health Research (454) Psychotic Disorders (161) Innovations in Mental Health Systems (390)

Published on in Vol 8, No 6 (2021): June

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/25998, first published .
Impact of Jointly Using an e–Mental Health Resource (Self-Management And Recovery Technology) on Interactions Between Service Users Experiencing Severe Mental Illness and Community Mental Health Workers: Grounded Theory Study

Impact of Jointly Using an e–Mental Health Resource (Self-Management And Recovery Technology) on Interactions Between Service Users Experiencing Severe Mental Illness and Community Mental Health Workers: Grounded Theory Study

Impact of Jointly Using an e–Mental Health Resource (Self-Management And Recovery Technology) on Interactions Between Service Users Experiencing Severe Mental Illness and Community Mental Health Workers: Grounded Theory Study

Authors of this article:

Anne Williams1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ellie Fossey2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   John Farhall4, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Fiona Foley6 Author Orcid Image ;   Neil Thomas6, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. McLeod B, Meyer C, Meyer D, Nunan C, Murray G, Farhall J, Thomas N. Do recovery‐oriented messages improve self‐efficacy and positive emotions amongst people with lived experience of psychosis? Experimental investigation. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 2022;95(4):1003 View
  2. Jørgensen S, Lee K, Harnow Klausen S, Petersen E, Nørgaard B. Patients’ perspectives on telemedicine in the encounter between healthcare and patients with mental illness: A systematic review. The European Journal of Psychiatry 2023;37(1):44 View
  3. Bonnechère B, Rintala A, Spooren A, Lamers I, Feys P. Is mHealth a Useful Tool for Self-Assessment and Rehabilitation of People with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review. Brain Sciences 2021;11(9):1187 View
  4. Vroegindeweij A, Levelt L, Houtveen J, Van de Putte E, Wulffraat N, Swart J, Nijhof S. Dynamic modeling of experience sampling methodology data reveals large heterogeneity in biopsychosocial factors associated with persistent fatigue in young people living with a chronic condition. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2023;167:111195 View
  5. Farhall J, Castle D, Constantine E, Foley F, Kyrios M, Rossell S, Arnold C, Leitan N, Villagonzalo K, Brophy L, Fossey E, Meyer D, Mihalopoulos C, Murray G, Nunan C, Sterling L, Thomas N. Using a digital personal recovery resource in routine mental health practice: feasibility, acceptability and outcomes. Journal of Mental Health 2023;32(3):567 View
  6. Balcombe L, De Leo D. Human-Computer Interaction in Digital Mental Health. Informatics 2022;9(1):14 View
  7. Jørgensen S, Petersen E, Harnow S, Lee K, Nørgaard B. The meaning that people with severe mental illnesses ascribe to e‐health in encounters with healthcare professionals – A repeat interview study. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 2024;33(1):62 View