This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

JMH Theme Issue: COVID-19 and Mental Health: Impact and Interventions (383) JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue (2452) Digital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (1514) Anxiety and Stress Disorders (1053) Theme Issue: Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak Rapid Reports (1517) Methods and New Tools in Mental Health Research (454) Outbreak and Pandemic Preparedness and Management (1727) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1363) Validity, Reliability, and Bias (93)

Published on in Vol 8, No 11 (2021): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/30961, first published .
An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

Authors of this article:

Ivan Blanco1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Teresa Boemo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (13) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Neta M, Harp N, Tong T, Clinchard C, Brown C, Gross J, Uusberg A. Think again: the role of reappraisal in reducing negative valence bias. Cognition and Emotion 2023;37(2):238 View
  2. Carlson J, Fang L, Kassel D. The questionable validity of attention bias variability: Evidence from two conceptually unrelated cognitive tasks. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports 2022;10:100411 View
  3. Boemo T, Socastro A, Blanco I, Martin-Garcia O, Pacheco-Romero A, Rodríguez-Carvajal R, Sanchez-Lopez A. A Novel Experience Sampling Method Tool Integrating Momentary Assessments of Cognitive Biases: Two Compliance, Usability, and Measurement Reactivity Studies. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(3):e32537 View
  4. Nash C. Fear-Responses to Bat-Originating Coronavirus Pandemics with Respect to Quarantines Gauged in Relation to Postmodern Thought—Implications and Recommendations. COVID 2022;2(10):1303 View
  5. Martin-Romero N, Sanchez-Lopez A. Negative interpretation bias as a clinical marker and a scar of depression: New insights from a large-scale study of the scrambled sentence task in formerly, subclinically and clinically depressed individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2023;163:104276 View
  6. Blanco I, Boemo T, Martin-Garcia O, Koster E, De Raedt R, Sanchez-Lopez A. Online Contingent Attention Training (OCAT): transfer effects to cognitive biases, rumination, and anxiety symptoms from two proof-of-principle studies. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2023;8(1) View
  7. Grocott B, Battaglini A, Jopling E, Tracy A, Rnic K, Sanchez‐Lopez A, LeMoult J. Do markers of daily affect mediate associations between interpretation bias and depressive symptoms? A longitudinal study of early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence 2023;95(8):1628 View
  8. Godara M, Everaert J, Sanchez-Lopez A, Joormann J, De Raedt R. Interplay between uncertainty intolerance, emotion regulation, cognitive flexibility, and psychopathology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-wave study. Scientific Reports 2023;13(1) View
  9. Würtz F, Kube T, Woud M, Margraf J, Blackwell S. Reduced Belief Updating in the Context of Depressive Symptoms: An Investigation of the Associations with Interpretation Biases and Self-Evaluation. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2024;48(2):225 View
  10. Godara M, Hecht M, Singer T. Training-related improvements in mental well-being through reduction in negative interpretation bias: A randomized trial of online socio-emotional dyadic and mindfulness interventions. Journal of Affective Disorders 2024;354:662 View
  11. Stover A, Shulkin J, Lac A, Rapp T. A meta-analysis of cognitive reappraisal and personal resilience. Clinical Psychology Review 2024;110:102428 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Gadassi Polack R, Davis A, Joormann J. Interpretational Processing Biases in Emotional Psychopathology. View
  2. Würtz F, Sanchez-Lopez A. Interpretational Processing Biases in Emotional Psychopathology. View