This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

JMH Theme Issue: COVID-19 and Mental Health: Impact and Interventions (346) JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue (2168) e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (997) Anxiety and Stress Disorders (842) Theme Issue: Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak Rapid Reports (1361) Methods and New Tools in Mental Health Research (361) Outbreak and Pandemic Preparedness and Management (1492) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1070)

Published on in Vol 8 , No 11 (2021) :November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/30961, first published .
An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

Authors of this article:

Ivan Blanco 1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Teresa Boemo 1 Author Orcid Image ;   Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez 1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Neta M, Harp N, Tong T, Clinchard C, Brown C, Gross J, Uusberg A. Think again: the role of reappraisal in reducing negative valence bias. Cognition and Emotion 2023;37(2):238 View
  2. Carlson J, Fang L, Kassel D. The questionable validity of attention bias variability: Evidence from two conceptually unrelated cognitive tasks. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports 2022;10:100411 View
  3. Boemo T, Socastro A, Blanco I, Martin-Garcia O, Pacheco-Romero A, Rodríguez-Carvajal R, Sanchez-Lopez A. A Novel Experience Sampling Method Tool Integrating Momentary Assessments of Cognitive Biases: Two Compliance, Usability, and Measurement Reactivity Studies. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(3):e32537 View
  4. Nash C. Fear-Responses to Bat-Originating Coronavirus Pandemics with Respect to Quarantines Gauged in Relation to Postmodern Thought—Implications and Recommendations. COVID 2022;2(10):1303 View
  5. Martin-Romero N, Sanchez-Lopez A. Negative interpretation bias as a clinical marker and a scar of depression: New insights from a large-scale study of the scrambled sentence task in formerly, subclinically and clinically depressed individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2023;163:104276 View
  6. Blanco I, Boemo T, Martin-Garcia O, Koster E, De Raedt R, Sanchez-Lopez A. Online Contingent Attention Training (OCAT): transfer effects to cognitive biases, rumination, and anxiety symptoms from two proof-of-principle studies. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2023;8(1) View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Gadassi Polack R, Davis A, Joormann J. Interpretational Processing Biases in Emotional Psychopathology. View
  2. Würtz F, Sanchez-Lopez A. Interpretational Processing Biases in Emotional Psychopathology. View