This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

JMH Theme Issue: COVID-19 and Mental Health: Impact and Interventions 2023 (409) JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue (2554) Digital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (2111) Anxiety and Stress Disorders (1330) Theme Issue: Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak Rapid Reports (1542) Methods and New Tools in Mental Health Research (558) Outbreak and Pandemic Preparedness and Management (1826) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1691) Validity, Reliability, and Bias (110)

Published on in Vol 8, No 11 (2021): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/30961, first published .
An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

An Online Assessment to Evaluate the Role of Cognitive Biases and Emotion Regulation Strategies for Mental Health During the COVID-19 Lockdown of 2020: Structural Equation Modeling Study

Authors of this article:

Ivan Blanco1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Teresa Boemo1 Author Orcid Image ;   Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (18) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Neta M, Harp N, Tong T, Clinchard C, Brown C, Gross J, Uusberg A. Think again: the role of reappraisal in reducing negative valence bias. Cognition and Emotion 2023;37(2):238 View
  2. Carlson J, Fang L, Kassel D. The questionable validity of attention bias variability: Evidence from two conceptually unrelated cognitive tasks. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports 2022;10:100411 View
  3. Boemo T, Socastro A, Blanco I, Martin-Garcia O, Pacheco-Romero A, Rodríguez-Carvajal R, Sanchez-Lopez A. A Novel Experience Sampling Method Tool Integrating Momentary Assessments of Cognitive Biases: Two Compliance, Usability, and Measurement Reactivity Studies. JMIR Formative Research 2022;6(3):e32537 View
  4. Nash C. Fear-Responses to Bat-Originating Coronavirus Pandemics with Respect to Quarantines Gauged in Relation to Postmodern Thought—Implications and Recommendations. COVID 2022;2(10):1303 View
  5. Martin-Romero N, Sanchez-Lopez A. Negative interpretation bias as a clinical marker and a scar of depression: New insights from a large-scale study of the scrambled sentence task in formerly, subclinically and clinically depressed individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2023;163:104276 View
  6. Blanco I, Boemo T, Martin-Garcia O, Koster E, De Raedt R, Sanchez-Lopez A. Online Contingent Attention Training (OCAT): transfer effects to cognitive biases, rumination, and anxiety symptoms from two proof-of-principle studies. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 2023;8(1) View
  7. Grocott B, Battaglini A, Jopling E, Tracy A, Rnic K, Sanchez‐Lopez A, LeMoult J. Do markers of daily affect mediate associations between interpretation bias and depressive symptoms? A longitudinal study of early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence 2023;95(8):1628 View
  8. Godara M, Everaert J, Sanchez-Lopez A, Joormann J, De Raedt R. Interplay between uncertainty intolerance, emotion regulation, cognitive flexibility, and psychopathology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multi-wave study. Scientific Reports 2023;13(1) View
  9. Würtz F, Kube T, Woud M, Margraf J, Blackwell S. Reduced Belief Updating in the Context of Depressive Symptoms: An Investigation of the Associations with Interpretation Biases and Self-Evaluation. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2024;48(2):225 View
  10. Godara M, Hecht M, Singer T. Training-related improvements in mental well-being through reduction in negative interpretation bias: A randomized trial of online socio-emotional dyadic and mindfulness interventions. Journal of Affective Disorders 2024;354:662 View
  11. Stover A, Shulkin J, Lac A, Rapp T. A meta-analysis of cognitive reappraisal and personal resilience. Clinical Psychology Review 2024;110:102428 View
  12. Martin-Garcia O, Blanco I, Sanchez-Lopez A. Do we interpret ambiguity and feel according to how we define ourselves? Relationships between self-perception, interpretation biases, and their role on emotional symptoms. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2024;15 View
  13. Espinosa F, Blanco I, Martin-Romero N, Sanchez-Lopez A. Cognitive Biases and Emotional Symptomatology as Predictors of Changes in Peer Victimization: A Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling Study. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology 2025;53(9):1325 View
  14. Du Y, Xia Y, Hua L, Chattun M, Dai Z, Tian S, You W, He C, Liu J, Sheng J, Pei C, Liao Q, Han Y, Tang H, Yao Z, Lu Q. Spatiotemporal dynamics of amygdala during implicit and explicit facial emotional recognition in major depressive disorder: An MEG study. Psychological Medicine 2025;55 View
  15. Chen J. Promoting tacit knowledge sharing through online collaborative learning in higher education: evidence from Logit–ISM analysis. Interactive Learning Environments 2025:1 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Gadassi Polack R, Davis A, Joormann J. Interpretational Processing Biases in Emotional Psychopathology. View
  2. Würtz F, Sanchez-Lopez A. Interpretational Processing Biases in Emotional Psychopathology. View
  3. Vos L, Smeets T, Everaert J. The Handbook of Mental Health Communication. View