This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1290) Big Data (220) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1278) Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management (1015) e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (1411) GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Applications in Public Health and Spatial Epidemiology (95) Mental Health Surveillance and Epidemiology (53) Innovative Methods in Public Health and Surveillance (307) Surveillance Systems (430)

Published on in Vol 9, No 3 (2022): March

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35253, first published .
Utilizing Big Data From Google Trends to Map Population Depression in the United States: Exploratory Infodemiology Study

Utilizing Big Data From Google Trends to Map Population Depression in the United States: Exploratory Infodemiology Study

Utilizing Big Data From Google Trends to Map Population Depression in the United States: Exploratory Infodemiology Study

Authors of this article:

Alex Wang1 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert McCarron1 Author Orcid Image ;   Daniel Azzam1 Author Orcid Image ;   Annamarie Stehli1 Author Orcid Image ;   Glen Xiong2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jeremy DeMartini2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (5) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, United States

    2Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Alex Wang, BSc

    Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior

    University of California, Irvine

    101 The City Dr S

    Orange, CA, 92868

    United States

    Phone: 1 8584059768

    Email: wangaj3@uci.edu


    Background: The epidemiology of mental health disorders has important theoretical and practical implications for health care service and planning. The recent increase in big data storage and subsequent development of analytical tools suggest that mining search databases may yield important trends on mental health, which can be used to support existing population health studies.

    Objective: This study aimed to map depression search intent in the United States based on internet-based mental health queries.

    Methods: Weekly data on mental health searches were extracted from Google Trends for an 11-year period (2010-2021) and separated by US state for the following terms: “feeling sad,” “depressed,” “depression,” “empty,” “insomnia,” “fatigue,” “guilty,” “feeling guilty,” and “suicide.” Multivariable regression models were created based on geographic and environmental factors and normalized to the following control terms: “sports,” “news,” “google,” “youtube,” “facebook,” and “netflix.” Heat maps of population depression were generated based on search intent.

    Results: Depression search intent grew 67% from January 2010 to March 2021. Depression search intent showed significant seasonal patterns with peak intensity during winter (adjusted P<.001) and early spring months (adjusted P<.001), relative to summer months. Geographic location correlated with depression search intent with states in the Northeast (adjusted P=.01) having higher search intent than states in the South.

    Conclusions: The trends extrapolated from Google Trends successfully correlate with known risk factors for depression, such as seasonality and increasing latitude. These findings suggest that Google Trends may be a valid novel epidemiological tool to map depression prevalence in the United States.

    JMIR Ment Health 2022;9(3):e35253

    doi:10.2196/35253

    Keywords

    depression; epidemiology; internet; google trends; big data; mental health 


    Over the past few decades, the amount of data stored, transferred, and analyzed has grown extensively, with the big data market reaching a value of US $139 billion in 2020 [1]. The term “big data” was coined in 2005 in reference to a large set of data that was essentially impossible to manage and process using traditional methods and tools [2]. As industries and companies have developed analytic tools targeted toward big data, information that was once inaccessible is now obtainable. One of the most important applications of big data in medicine is extrapolating trends and using them to support health care groups and organizations seeking to understand population health changes and predict the future.

    Google Trends is a free online tool developed by Google LLC in 2008 that allows users from anywhere in the world to analyze big data [3]. It tracks search content across various countries and languages and compares relative search intent between 2 or more terms. The usefulness of Google Trends was demonstrated in 2009: Ginsberg et al [4] published a groundbreaking study predicting the spread of influenza earlier than the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Google Trends was subsequently utilized to predict the outbreaks of many viruses, including the West Nile virus, norovirus, varicella, influenza, and HIV [5-8]. More recently, Google Trends has been frequently used to study a variety of health care domains, including the COVID-19 pandemic [9].

    Depression is the most common psychiatric disorder in the United States, with 18.5% of adults experiencing symptoms of depression in 2019 [10,11]. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of depression symptoms has increased to 27.8%, affecting an estimated 91.2 million Americans [12]. Epidemiological data for depression have traditionally been collected through surveys. Major organizations such as the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Anxiety & Depression Association of America (ADAA), and CDC provide only limited data specific to the time and population being studied from their surveys [13-15]. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC and US Census Bureau collaborated to track mental health in the United States [16].

    In this study, we provide estimates of depression search intent across the United States using big data from Google Trends. Our analysis fills the gap in current depression epidemiology, which is mainly derived from voluntary surveys, by extrapolating trends from big data across time and space. We provide an analysis of how internet search intent can be used to map population depression and how this can be compared in relation to depression risk factors. This model serves as a proof of concept that analyzing big data in association with environmental and geographic factors can be used as an epidemiological tool for psychiatric disease surveillance models. In terms of population health, analysis of Google Trends depression search intent represents a digital epidemiological tool that may one day be used for real-time surveillance of high-risk and underserved populations. The trends accessed through internet data may one day guide public policies, workforce supply decisions, and allocation of resources.


    Google Trends

    The following methodologies were designed based on published methods [17-19]. All search queries entered into Google’s search engine become anonymized and grouped based on both the general query topic and the specific keywords entered. Google Trends interprets the information and normalizes the data into an index between 0 and 100. The numbers represent the search interest relative to the highest point based on the given location and time frame within the query. A value of 100 represents highest search popularity for a term, and a value of 50 represents half the search popularity for a term [20].

    To examine the US population’s interest in depression, we completed a series of search queries in Google Trends between January 1, 2010 and March 1, 2021. Data sets were downloaded for symptoms and terms listed by the American Psychiatric Association for major depressive disorder: “feeling sad,” “depressed,” “depression,” “empty,” “insomnia,” “fatigue,” “guilty,” “feeling guilty,” and “suicide” [21]. To account for random variance and overall increases in search queries, data sets were also downloaded across similar time periods for control terms based on previously published studies and popular internet search terms: “sports,” “news,” “google,” “youtube,” “facebook,” and “netflix” [18,19,22]. The values of depression search intent were summed and normalized relative to the control terms for the given region and time and are represented on a scale of 0 to 100 arbitrary units (AU).

    Two separate data sets were extracted from Google Trends. The first data set represents the entire US public interest in depression over time with a data frequency of monthly averages from January 1, 2010 to March 1, 2021. The second data set represents public interest in depression on a statewide level collected as a single value per state averaged from January 1, 2010 to March 1, 2021.

    Environmental and Geographic Risk Factors

    Given the known phenomenon of seasonal affective disorder, we obtained the annual temperature, humidity, and sunshine percentage from 1971 to 2000 from the National Climatic Center to assess for environmental and geographic risk factors of depression [23]. The sunshine percentage represents the percentage of time between sunrise and sunset that the sun reaches the earth’s surface. For the Air Quality Index (AQI), we obtained data from the 2010 to 2014 American Community Survey [24]. Values from the AQI were calculated for 4 major air pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act [25]. Lastly, data for urban percentage were obtained from the 2010 US Census [26].

    Statistical Analysis

    Multiple linear regression models were conducted to analyze the relationship between depression search queries and environmental factors and geographic factors. Confounding variables were identified using a correlation matrix and appropriately removed. The P values for each variable were adjusted according to the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, with statistical significance determined at an adjusted P<.05. For predictive analysis, the multivariable regression models were constructed to generate quadratic forecasts to predict depression search intent and control search intent. The multiple regression models allowed us to account for confounding variables and prevent ecological fallacies according to previously published methods [27,28]. The values for normalized depression search intent were categorized into 4 regions according to the US Census Bureau: Northeast, Midwest, South, and West [29]. Geographic heat maps were generated in Microsoft Excel 2018 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) to visualize the relationship between state temperature and state depression search intent.


    Multivariable Regression Model and Predictive Analysis in Relation to Time and Seasonality

    The Google Trends data from January 2010 to March 2021 demonstrated an upward trend such that depression search intent grew 67% from 58.7 AU to 92.9 AU (n=135), while control search intent grew 24% to 67.1 AU (n=135). Based on the quadratic forecasts, depression search intent is predicted to increase an additional 7.4% to 99.8 AU in 2025 (95% CI 96.6 to 102.9 AU; n=135), while control search intent is predicted to increase 3.5% to 64.7 AU (95% CI 63.7 to 65.7 AU; n=135). A significant pattern of seasonality can be observed in Figure 1 with a peak in depression searches in the spring (March, April, May) and a trough in depression searches during the summer (June, July, August).

    ‎
    Figure 1. Time series plot of search intent for depression and control terms in the United States from 2010 to 2021 with predictive forecasts to 2025; demonstrates significant upward trend and seasonal pattern in depression search intent over time. AU: arbitrary unit.
    View this figure

    Table 1 presents the multivariable regression model using time and seasonality to predict depression search intent over time. The variables that were significant predictors of search intent were time (r=0.69, adjusted P<.001; n=135), time2 (r=0.91, adjusted P<.001; n=135), winter (r=0.03, adjusted P<.001; n=135), spring (r=0.12, adjusted P<.001; n=135), and fall (r=0.06, adjusted P<.001; n=135). Applying the regression model, there was a 0.5 AU (95% CI 0.42 to 0.57 AU; n=135) month-over month increase in depression search intent from 2010 to 2021. Depression search intent in the spring, fall, and winter were 7.0 AU (95% CI 5.3 to 8.7 AU; n=135), 4.6 AU (95% CI 2.9 to 6.4 AU; n=135), and 4.5 AU (95% CI 2.8 to 6.2 AU; n=135) higher than in summer, respectively.

    Table 1. Multivariable regression model using time variables and season to predict seasonal depression search intent (R2=0.91).
    VariablesCoefficientsStandard errort statisticP valueAdjusted P valuear
    Intercept56.44.712.1<.001<.001–b
    Control0.00.1–0.4.70.990.69
    Time0.50.012.9<.001<.0010.91
    Time20.00.0–6.8<.001<.0010.83
    Winterc4.50.95.3<.001<.0010.03
    Springc7.00.98.2<.001<.0010.12
    Fallc4.60.95.2<.001<.0010.06

    aBonferroni correction for 4 independent analyses on the dependent variable (alpha=.05).

    bNot applicable.

    cRelative to summer.

    Multivariable Regression Model in Relation to Environmental and Geographic Risk Factors

    Table 2 presents the multivariable regression model of depression search intent based on state-specific environmental and geographic factors and has a predictive value of R2=0.57. In this model, variables that were significant predictors of depression search intent were AQI (r=0.30, adjusted P=.01; n=50) and the South (r=–0.2, adjusted P=.01; n=50). Applying the regression model, as AQI increased by 1, the depression search intent increased by 0.4 AU (95% CI 0.14 to 0.61 AU; n=50). Examining the depression search intent relative to US census regions, the South had a decrease of 6.3 AU (95% CI –10.2 to –2.3, adjusted P=.01; n=50) relative to the Northeast. Figure 2 visually demonstrates the regional differences such that states in the South such as Florida and Texas had lower depression search intent in comparison with states in the Northeast such as Maine and Pennsylvania. No relationships existed between depression search intent and temperature (r=–0.5, adjusted P=.99; n=50), humidity (r=0.2, adjusted P=.99; n=50), urban percentage (r=0.3, adjusted P=.06; n=50), or sunshine percentage (r=–0.5, adjusted P=.99; n=50).

    Table 2. Multivariable regression model of depression search intent in relation to environmental and geographic risk factors (R2=0.57).
    VariablesaCoefficientsStandard errort statisticP value Adjusted P valuebr
    Intercept94.912.27.8<.001<.001-c
    Temperature0.00.1–0.3.74.99–0.5
    Humidity0.00.10.1.89.990.2
    Air Quality Index0.40.13.2.002.010.3
    Urban %–0.10.0–2.7.01.060.3
    Sunshine %–9.013.1–0.7.50.99–0.5
    Southd–6.31.9–3.2.002.01–0.2
    West–4.41.8–2.5.02.11–0.3
    Midwest–3.81.6–2.4.02.120.1

    aMultivariable regression model using environmental and geographic risk variables to predict depression search intent. Environmental and geographic data sets were collected as an average from 1971 to 2000 and 2008 to 2019, respectively (n=50). This model predicts depression search intent for each state based on the state\'s average annual temperature, humidity, air quality, urban %, sunshine %, and US census region.

    bBonferroni correction for 6 independent analyses on the dependent variable (alpha=.05).

    cNot applicable.

    dRelative to the Northeast.

    ‎
    Figure 2. Geographic heat maps of the United States visualizing depression search intent on (A) Google Trends, (B) Air Quality Index, and (C) average annual temperature (° F) by state.
    View this figure

    Principal Findings

    To our knowledge, this is the first study to geographically map depression search intent across the United States in relation to environmental and geographic risk factors by using statistical analysis of big data through Google Trends. Traditionally, prevalence data for mental health and depression have been collected through surveys that require an intensive amount of time and resources to conduct [12-14,30,31]. These surveys are limited not only by human and monetary resources but also by participants’ willingness to be included in research. According to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (SAMHSA), 32.9% of the selected sample did not complete the interview because of refusal to participate, absence from their home, language barriers, or other reasons such as physical or mental incompetence [32]. Response bias is a known recurring issue with epidemiological surveys and has been difficult to overcome as patients with severe mental health and the homeless population are continuously marginalized by society [33].

    The solution to this problem may be utilization of big data found through the internet. In 2020, roughly 86% of the total US population had access to the internet [34]. A US study in greater Los Angeles that examined digital technology use in homeless populations discovered that 94% owned a cell phone [35]. Currently where digital technology is a requirement for survival, internet data can be used to track populations from all over the world over any period. The use of real-time monitoring of internet data to track trends and diseases overcomes the issues of resources, time, and physical location. Analyzing big data through Google Trends is free to researchers and provides information and predictive insight that may one day surpass national or local surveillance systems.

    Comparison With Prior Work

    The validity of using big data for epidemiology was demonstrated during the influenza outbreak of 2009. At the time, Google Trends was an experimental tool used by researchers for real-time monitoring of influenza outbreaks [36]. By analyzing health care info-seeking behavior on the Google search engine, Google Trends was able to detect regional outbreaks of influenza 7-10 days before the CDC. Google Trends has been successfully used to track viral outbreaks and is currently being used to monitor COVID-19 outbreaks across the world [4-9,37,38].

    Depression is a major public health concern and one of the most prevalent mental health illnesses in the United States [10,39]. In 2010, the estimated annual economic consequence of depression was upwards of US $200 billion [40,41]. Considering depression also leads to diminished productivity, poor quality of life, and negative psychological impacts on well-being, the true costs of depression on society are much higher [42]. Worsening mental health and an increasing prevalence of depression, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, signify the increasing importance of monitoring and treating patients with depression. Based on our analysis, Google search intent for depression in the United States has grown by 67% from 2010 to 2021 and is projected to grow another 7.4% by 2025. This increase reflects the epidemiological trends reported by US national surveys, with an increase in depression prevalence by 61% from 2008 to 2018 (6.6% to 10.4%) [43,44]. This corroborates the concept that, as depression prevalence in the United States continues to grow, so does the information-seeking behavior on Google Trends. Furthermore, depression search intent in the United States demonstrated a significant seasonal pattern, such that depression search intent was lowest in the summer. Relative to the summer, the fall, winter, and spring seasons had an increase in depression search intent by 4.6 AU, 4.5 AU, and 7.0 AU, respectively. This increase in depression search intent reflects the seasonal pattern of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) which has been shown to have higher prevalence in the fall and winter seasons and a decrease in the summer [45,46]. Although SAD has been shown to begin remission in the spring, the increase in depression search intent in the spring may reflect population interest in depression in the early stages of a patient’s recovery.

    In relation to environmental and geographic risk factors, the state’s air quality and geographic location had significant predictive values for depression search intent. States that had a 1-unit higher AQI had an increase in depression search intent by 0.4 AU In other words, states with worse air pollution had higher levels of depression search intent than states with cleaner air. These results reflect previously published findings that air pollution is linked to depression [47-49]. Our results comparing the 4 US census regions demonstrated that the South had less search intent, by 6.3 AU, relative to the Northeast. The West and Midwest also demonstrated decreased levels of depression search intent, by 4.4 AU and 3.8 AU, respectively, though their adjusted P values were insignificant. These results reflect the findings that depression is correlated with latitude, with regions further from the equator having a higher prevalence of depression [42,50]. Although the season and location of a state cannot fully predict the depression search intent at a given time, the trends extrapolated from Google Trends have demonstrated their validity in relation to known risks of depression.

    Although mining for epidemiological trends within big data is a fascinating prospect, it should not be assumed to replace the work of national and public health organizations. Instead, researchers should consider comparing their results with big data and using big data to support their findings. Our study has demonstrated that depression search intent increased over time following a seasonal pattern and was higher in states with higher air pollution and states with northern latitudes. This supports the trends found in US epidemiological surveys on mental health and supports published results of known risk factors for depression.

    Future studies should build upon the results demonstrated here by examining other risk factors for depression such as socioeconomic, demographic, or lifestyle variables. More specifically, whether age, income, marital status, race/ethnicity, or gender are predictive variables of depression search intent, both on national and state levels. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, future studies should analyze the data based on advanced time series modeling to analyze the effects of the pandemic on mental health. In the future, public organizations such as the CDC or regional hospitals may be able to monitor depression prevalence in real time based on the search intent of their communities through publicly available internet data. The clinical applications of big data in the medical field are limitless and will continue to become more useful as technology software improves.

    Limitations

    Several limitations are present in our study. First, interpreting the trends extrapolated from Google Trends is challenging without supporting clinical information normally collected by traditional surveys such as medical comorbidities or symptom severity. Second, the data in Google Trends may be influenced by various factors such as trending television shows or bots. For example, in 2017, the internet search intent for suicide queries increased by 19% over a 19-day span after the release of popular Netflix series, 13 Reasons Why, which elevated suicide awareness [51]. Third, our data may overrepresent people that search terms in English as Google Trends does not combine search intent of the same word in another language. Fourth, the geographic and environmental data sets were consolidated into a single data point for each state regardless of varying climates and heterogenous landscapes. Lastly, patients with severe or debilitating depression may not have the capacity to search for depression or have the access if they are hospitalized. These limitations illustrate that overreliance on big data, much like on epidemiological studies, may inadvertently exclude certain populations.

    Conclusions

    Our study is the first to demonstrate that big data in Google Trends can be successfully utilized as a novel epidemiological tool to geographically map out population depression in the United States. This method of mapping allows for easier visualization of areas with higher depression search intent, which were mostly states with higher air pollution and those further from the equator. The interest in depression has grown tremendously in the past decade, with an upward trend that follows a seasonal variation pattern similarly seen in SAD. AQI and geographic location were stronger predictors of depression search intent than temperature, humidity, urban percentage, or sunshine percentage. Further investigation is needed to determine whether the factors significant in our study hold true to depression trends across the world. From a clinical perspective, narrowing the scope of depression search intent to specific cities or high-risk populations should be the next goal of researchers.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. Big Data Market by Component, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Business Function (Operations, Finance, and Marketing and Sales), Industry Vertical (BFSI, Manufacturing, and Healthcare and Life Sciences), and Region - Global Forecast to 2025. MarketsandMarkets. 2020 Mar 01.   URL: https://www.marketresearch.com/MarketsandMarkets-v3719/Big-Data-Component-Deployment-Mode-13117116/ [accessed 2021-04-01]
    2. van Rijmenam M. A Short History Of Big Data. Datafloq. 2013 Jan 7.   URL: https://datafloq.com/read/big-data-history/ [accessed 2021-03-01]
    3. Jun S, Yoo HS, Choi S. Ten years of research change using Google Trends: From the perspective of big data utilizations and applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2018 May;130:69-87. [CrossRef]
    4. Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, Brilliant L. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 2009 Feb 19;457(7232):1012-1014. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Johnson A, Mehta S. A comparison of Internet search trends and sexually transmitted infection rates using Google trends. Sex Transm Dis 2014 Jan;41(1):61-63. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Jena AB, Karaca-Mandic P, Weaver L, Seabury SA. Predicting new diagnoses of HIV infection using internet search engine data. Clin Infect Dis 2013 May 18;56(9):1352-1353. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Pelat C, Turbelin C, Bar-Hen A, Flahault A, Valleron A. More diseases tracked by using Google Trends. Emerg Infect Dis 2009 Aug;15(8):1327-1328 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Wilson K, Brownstein JS. Early detection of disease outbreaks using the Internet. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2009 Mar 12;180(8):829-831. [CrossRef]
    9. Mavragani A, Gkillas K. COVID-19 predictability in the United States using Google Trends time series. Sci Rep 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20693 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Kessler RC, Ormel J, Petukhova M, McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Russo LJ, et al. Development of lifetime comorbidity in the World Health Organization world mental health surveys. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Jan 03;68(1):90-100 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Villarroel M, Terlizzi EP. Symptoms of depression among adults: United States, 2019. NCHS Data Brief 2020 Sep(379):1-8. [Medline]
    12. Ettman CK, Abdalla SM, Cohen GH, Sampson L, Vivier PM, Galea S. Prevalence of depression symptoms in US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020 Sep 01;3(9):e2019686 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Major Depression. National Institute of Mental Health. Bethesda, MD: NIMH; 2020 Jan 1.   URL: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression [accessed 2021-03-31]
    14. Anxiety & Depression Association of America. Silver Spring, MD: ADAA; 2020.   URL: https://adaa.org/understanding-anxiety/depression [accessed 2021-04-01]
    15. FastStats - Depression. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2020.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/depression.htm [accessed 2021-04-01]
    16. Mental Health - Household Pulse Survey - COVID-19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/pulse/mental-health.htm [accessed 2021-04-01]
    17. Zitting K, Lammers-van der Holst HM, Yuan RK, Wang W, Quan SF, Duffy JF. Google Trends reveals increases in internet searches for insomnia during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) global pandemic. J Clin Sleep Med 2021 Feb 01;17(2):177-184 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Azzam D, Nag N, Tran J, Chen L, Visnagra K, Marshall K, et al. A novel epidemiological approach to geographically mapping population dry eye disease in the United States through Google Trends. Cornea 2021 Mar 01;40(3):282-291. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Azzam DB, Cypen SG, Tao JP. Oculofacial plastic surgery-related online search trends including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Orbit 2021 Feb 14;40(1):44-50. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Google Trends. Google.   URL: https://support.google.com/trends/?hl=en#topic=6248052 [accessed 2021-03-01]
    21. Torres F. What is Depression? American Psychiatric Association. 2020 Oct 1.   URL: http://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/depression/what-is-depression [accessed 2021-04-01]
    22. Soulo T. Top Google Searches. Ahrefs. 2021 Jan 1.   URL: https://ahrefs.com/blog/top-google-searches/ [accessed 2021-04-01]
    23. National Climate Report - Annual 2020. National Centers for Environmental Information. 2021 Jan 1.   URL: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/national/202013 [accessed 2021-04-01]
    24. U.S. Air Quality Index State Rank. USA.com. 2014 Jan 1.   URL: http://www.usa.com/rank/us--air-quality-index--state-rank.htm [accessed 2021-04-01]
    25. Air Quality by State 2021. World Population Review. 2021 Jan 1.   URL: https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/air-quality-by-state [accessed 2021-04-01]
    26. Mesenbourg T, Potok N, Lamas L. United States Summary: 2010: Population and Housing Unit Counts. US Census Bureau. 2012 Sep.   URL: https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/2010/cph-2/cph-2-1.pdf [accessed 2022-03-27]
    27. McNamee R. Regression modelling and other methods to control confounding. Occup Environ Med 2005 Jul 01;62(7):500-6, 472 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Portnov BA, Dubnov J, Barchana M. On ecological fallacy, assessment errors stemming from misguided variable selection, and the effect of aggregation on the outcome of epidemiological study. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2007 Jan 11;17(1):106-121. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. US Census Bureau.   URL: https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/maps-data/maps/reference/us_regdiv.pdf [accessed 2021-04-01]
    30. Brody D, Pratt L, Hughes J. Prevalence of Depression Among Adults Aged 20 and Over: United States, 2013-2016. NCHS Data Brief 2018 Feb(303):1-8 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    31. 2019 NSDUH Detailed Tables. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2020 Sep 11.   URL: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2019-nsduh-detailed-tables [accessed 2022-03-27]
    32. 2017 Methodological Summary And Definitions. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2018 Sep 14.   URL: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2017-methodological-summary-and-definitions [accessed 2021-03-31]
    33. Room R. Stigma, social inequality and alcohol and drug use. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005 Mar;24(2):143-155. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Johnson J. Internet user penetration in the United States from 2017 to 2025. Statista. 2021 Aug 4.   URL: http://www.statista.com/statistics/590800/internet-usage-reach-usa [accessed 2021-04-01]
    35. Rhoades H, Wenzel SL, Rice E, Winetrobe H, Henwood B. No digital divide? Technology use among homeless adults. J Soc Distress Homeless 2017;26(1):73-77 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Carneiro H, Mylonakis E. Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clin Infect Dis 2009 Nov 15;49(10):1557-1564. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Prasanth S, Singh U, Kumar A, Tikkiwal VA, Chong PH. Forecasting spread of COVID-19 using google trends: A hybrid GWO-deep learning approach. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2021 Jan;142:110336 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Venkatesh U, Gandhi PA. Prediction of COVID-19 Outbreaks Using Google Trends in India: A Retrospective Analysis. Healthc Inform Res 2020 Jul;26(3):175-184. [CrossRef]
    39. Murray CJL, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, Birbeck G, Burstein R, Chou D, U.S. Burden of Disease Collaborators. The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA 2013 Aug 14;310(6):591-608 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Greenberg PE, Fournier A, Sisitsky T, Pike CT, Kessler RC. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J. Clin. Psychiatry 2015 Feb 25;76(02):155-162. [CrossRef]
    41. Chow W, Doane MJ, Sheehan J, Alphs L, Le H. Economic burden among patients with major depressive disorder: an analysis of healthcare resource use, work productivity, and direct and indirect costs by depression severity. The American Journal of Managed Care 2019 Feb 14:1-3 [FREE Full text]
    42. McTernan WP, Dollard MF, LaMontagne AD. Depression in the workplace: An economic cost analysis of depression-related productivity loss attributable to job strain and bullying. Work & Stress 2013 Nov 07;27(4):321-338. [CrossRef]
    43. Gonzalez O, McKnight-Eily LR, Strine T, Edwards VJ, Lu H, Croft JB. QuickStats: Age-Adjusted Death Rates for Parkinson Disease Among Adults Aged ≥65 Years - National Vital Statistics System, United States, 1999-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019 Sep 06;68(35):773-1235 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. Hasin DS, Sarvet AL, Meyers JL, Saha TD, Ruan WJ, Stohl M, et al. Epidemiology of adult major depressive disorder and its specifiers in the United States. JAMA Psychiatry 2018 Apr 01;75(4):336. [CrossRef]
    45. Magnusson A. An overview of epidemiological studies on seasonal affective disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000 Mar;101(3):176-184. [CrossRef]
    46. Rosen LN, Targum SD, Terman M, Bryant MJ, Hoffman H, Kasper SF, et al. Prevalence of seasonal affective disorder at four latitudes. Psychiatry Research 1990 Feb;31(2):131-144. [CrossRef]
    47. Gładka A, Rymaszewska J, Zatoński T. Impact of air pollution on depression and suicide. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2018 Dec 20;31(6):711-721 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Szyszkowicz M. Air pollution and emergency department visits for depression in Edmonton, Canada. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2007;20(3):241-245. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Lim Y, Kim H, Kim JH, Bae S, Park HY, Hong Y. Air pollution and symptoms of depression in elderly adults. Environ Health Perspect 2012 Jul;120(7):1023-1028 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Levitt AJ, Boyle MH. The impact of latitude on the prevalence of seasonal depression. Can J Psychiatry 2002 May 01;47(4):361-367. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Ayers JW, Althouse BM, Leas EC, Dredze M, Allem J. Internet searches for suicide following the release of 13 reasons why. JAMA Intern Med 2017 Oct 01;177(10):1527-1529 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    ADAA: Anxiety & Depression Association of America
    AQI: Air Quality Index
    AU: arbitrary units
    CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    NIMH: National Institute of Mental Health
    SAD: seasonal affective disorder
    SAMHSA: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

    Edited by J Torous; submitted 28.11.21; peer-reviewed by A Sharma, M Nuutinen, A Joseph, N Van; comments to author 03.01.22; revised version received 31.01.22; accepted 18.02.22; published 31.03.22

    Copyright

    ©Alex Wang, Robert McCarron, Daniel Azzam, Annamarie Stehli, Glen Xiong, Jeremy DeMartini. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 31.03.2022.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.