This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Users' and Patients' Needs for Mental Health Services (322) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1402) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research with Users (639) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1135) Mass Media/Social Media Communication and Campaigns (406) Methods and New Tools in Mental Health Research (383) Public Information and Campaigns on Mental Health (5)

Published on in Vol 8 , No 6 (2021) :June

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/25742, first published .
Twitter Users’ Views on Mental Health Crisis Resolution Team Care Compared With Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups: Qualitative Analysis

Twitter Users’ Views on Mental Health Crisis Resolution Team Care Compared With Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups: Qualitative Analysis

Twitter Users’ Views on Mental Health Crisis Resolution Team Care Compared With Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups: Qualitative Analysis

Authors of this article:

Natasha Chilman 1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Nicola Morant 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Brynmor Lloyd-Evans 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jane Wackett 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Sonia Johnson 2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (7) Metrics

Journals

  1. Morant N, Chilman N, Lloyd-Evans B, Wackett J, Johnson S. Acceptability of Using Social Media Content in Mental Health Research: A Reflection. Comment on “Twitter Users’ Views on Mental Health Crisis Resolution Team Care Compared With Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Groups: Qualitative Analysis”. JMIR Mental Health 2021;8(8):e32475 View
  2. Coady A, Lainchbury K, Godard R, Holtzman S. What twitter can tell us about user experiences of crisis text lines: A qualitative study. Internet Interventions 2022;28:100526 View
  3. Taylor T, Stockton S, Bowen M. Crisis resolution home treatment team Clinicians' perceptions of using a recovery approach with people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2023;30(3):558 View
  4. Mulligan L, Neil S, Johnstone M, Morris K, Swift E. Acceptability of the ‘Crisis Toolbox’: a skills-based intervention delivered in a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team during COVID-19. Community Mental Health Journal 2022;58(8):1487 View
  5. Cornelis J, Barakat A, Blankers M, Peen J, Lommerse N, Eikelenboom M, Zoeteman J, Van H, Beekman A, Dekker J. The effectiveness of intensive home treatment as a substitute for hospital admission in acute psychiatric crisis resolution in the Netherlands: a two-centre Zelen double-consent randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry 2022;9(8):625 View
  6. Thompson D, Deatrick J, Knafl K, Swallow V, Wu Y. A Pragmatic Guide to Qualitative Analysis for Pediatric Researchers. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 2022;47(9):1019 View
  7. Ainley E, Witwicki C, Tallett A, Graham C. Using Twitter Comments to Understand People’s Experiences of UK Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic and Sentiment Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(10):e31101 View
  8. Baumann S, Thompson J. Toward a more expansive and inclusive definition of women’s health: A content analysis of Twitter conversations. Health Care for Women International 2023:1 View