Published on in Vol 10 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/49783, first published .
Comparing the Acceptability and Quality of Intervention Modalities for Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Randomized Feasibility Trial

Comparing the Acceptability and Quality of Intervention Modalities for Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Randomized Feasibility Trial

Comparing the Acceptability and Quality of Intervention Modalities for Suicidality in the Emergency Department: Randomized Feasibility Trial

Journals

  1. Meyerhoff J, Popowski S, Lakhtakia T, Tack E, Kornfield R, Kruzan K, Krause C, Nguyen T, Rushton K, Pisani A, Reddy M, Van Orden K, Mohr D. Automated Digital Safety Planning Interventions for Young Adults: Qualitative Study Using Online Co-design Methods. JMIR Formative Research 2025;9:e69602 View
  2. Wardrope A, Blank L, Ferrar M, Goodacre S, Habershon D, Reuber M. Acceptability and Utility of a Web-Based Patient-Completed Clinical Decision Aid for the Differential Diagnosis of Transient Loss of Consciousness: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Formative Research 2025;9:e67608 View
  3. Thompson R, Mullinax S, DeMonte R, Waliski A, Wilson M. Peer-Delivered Written Versus Electronic Suicide Safety Planning in the Emergency Department. Crisis 2025;46(5):278 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Sankar G, Djamasbi S, Tulu B, Muehlschlegel S. Augmented Cognition. View