Published on in Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Jan-Mar

Heuristic Evaluation of Ehealth Interventions: Establishing Standards That Relate to the Therapeutic Process Perspective

Heuristic Evaluation of Ehealth Interventions: Establishing Standards That Relate to the Therapeutic Process Perspective

Heuristic Evaluation of Ehealth Interventions: Establishing Standards That Relate to the Therapeutic Process Perspective

Authors of this article:

Amit Baumel 1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Fred Muench 3 Author Orcid Image

Journals

  1. Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen M. Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(5):e10235 View
  2. Punukollu M, Marques M. Use of mobile apps and technologies in child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review. Evidence Based Mental Health 2019;22(4):161 View
  3. Aromatario O, Van Hoye A, Vuillemin A, Foucaut A, Crozet C, Pommier J, Cambon L. How do mobile health applications support behaviour changes? A scoping review of mobile health applications relating to physical activity and eating behaviours. Public Health 2019;175:8 View
  4. Batterham P, Calear A, O’Dea B, Larsen M, J Kavanagh D, Titov N, March S, Hickie I, Teesson M, Dear B, Reynolds J, Lowinger J, Thornton L, Gorman P. Stakeholder perspectives on evidence for digital mental health interventions: Implications for accreditation systems. DIGITAL HEALTH 2019;5:205520761987806 View
  5. Baumel A. Making the Case for a Feasible Evaluation Method of Available E-Mental Health Products. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2018;45(1):1 View
  6. Baumel A, Pawar A, Kane J, Correll C. Digital Parent Training for Children with Disruptive Behaviors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 2016;26(8):740 View
  7. Khowaja K, Al-Thani D. New Checklist for the Heuristic Evaluation of mHealth Apps (HE4EH): Development and Usability Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(10):e20353 View
  8. McClelland G, Fitzgerald M. A participatory mobile application (app) development project with mental health service users and clinicians. Health Education Journal 2018;77(7):815 View
  9. Kim B, Sharafoddini A, Tran N, Wen E, Lee J. Consumer Mobile Apps for Potential Drug-Drug Interaction Check: Systematic Review and Content Analysis Using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2018;6(3):e74 View
  10. Jansen-Kosterink S, Bergsma J, Francissen A, Naafs A. The first evaluation of a Mobile application to encourage social participation for community-dwelling older adults. Health and Technology 2020;10(5):1107 View
  11. Müssener U, Thomas K, Linderoth C, Löf M, Åsberg K, Henriksson P, Bendtsen M. Development of an Intervention Targeting Multiple Health Behaviors Among High School Students: Participatory Design Study Using Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(10):e17999 View
  12. Baumel A, Birnbaum M, Sucala M. A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Published Quality Criteria Related to the Evaluation of User-Facing eHealth Programs. Journal of Medical Systems 2017;41(8) View
  13. Müssener U, Löf M, Bendtsen P, Bendtsen M. Using Mobile Devices to Deliver Lifestyle Interventions Targeting At-Risk High School Students: Protocol for a Participatory Design Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2020;9(1):e14588 View
  14. Fitzgerald M, McClelland T. What makes a mobile app successful in supporting health behaviour change?. Health Education Journal 2017;76(3):373 View
  15. Baumel A, Faber K, Mathur N, Kane J, Muench F. Enlight: A Comprehensive Quality and Therapeutic Potential Evaluation Tool for Mobile and Web-Based eHealth Interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017;19(3):e82 View
  16. Srikesavan C, Williamson E, Cranston T, Hunter J, Adams J, Lamb S. An Online Hand Exercise Intervention for Adults With Rheumatoid Arthritis (mySARAH): Design, Development, and Usability Testing. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018;20(6):e10457 View
  17. Baumel A, Muench F, Edan S, Kane J. Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2019;21(9):e14567 View
  18. Brown J, Nam Kim H. Usability Evaluation of Alzheimer’s mHealth Applications for Caregivers. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2018;62(1):503 View
  19. Infarinato F, Jansen-Kosterink S, Romano P, van Velsen L, op den Akker H, Rizza F, Ottaviani M, Kyriazakos S, Wais-Zechmann B, Garschall M, Bonassi S, Hermens H. Acceptance and Potential Impact of the eWALL Platform for Health Monitoring and Promotion in Persons with a Chronic Disease or Age-Related Impairment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020;17(21):7893 View
  20. Baumel A, Muench F. Effort-Optimized Intervention Model: Framework for Building and Analyzing Digital Interventions That Require Minimal Effort for Health-Related Gains. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(3):e24905 View
  21. Platt I, Kannangara C, Carson J, Tytherleigh M. Heuristic assessment of psychological interventions in schools (HAPI Schools). Psychology in the Schools 2021;58(7):1399 View
  22. Broekhuis M, van Velsen L, Peute L, Halim M, Hermens H. Conceptualizing Usability for the eHealth Context: Content Analysis of Usability Problems of eHealth Applications. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(7):e18198 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Deb R, Mahto P, Deka L. Recent Developments in Individual and Organizational Adoption of ICTs. View
  2. Jansen-Kosterink S, Bulthuis R, ter Stal S, van Velsen L, Pnevmatikakis A, Kyriazakos S, Pomazanskyi A, op den Akker H. Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. View