Search Results (1 to 10 of 4196 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1113 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 781 JMIR Research Protocols
- 525 JMIR Formative Research
- 327 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 178 JMIR Mental Health
- 176 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 146 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 134 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 126 JMIR Human Factors
- 85 JMIR Cancer
- 70 Iproceedings
- 70 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 64 JMIR Aging
- 54 JMIR Medical Education
- 47 JMIR Diabetes
- 45 JMIR Serious Games
- 43 JMIR Dermatology
- 42 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 31 JMIR Cardio
- 25 JMIRx Med
- 22 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 19 JMIR Infodemiology
- 16 JMIR Nursing
- 15 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 12 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 11 JMIR AI
- 5 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 3 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 3 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 3 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 3 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 2 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Cocreating the Visualization of Digital Mobility Outcomes: Delphi-Type Process With Patients
A Delphi methodology was decided upon as it allows us to reach a consensus of patient preferences with an iterative, anonymous, multistage approach with controlled feedback of comments and scores on a 5-point Likert scale [30,31]. The Delphi methodology recommends 3 rounds of feedback; the first round is to generate qualitative data on a topic and the remaining rounds are to gain a consensus through Likert scales [31].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e68782
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
(computer, smartphone, internet, and text message) outside of the traditional F2 F therapy setting; and (4) the article was written in English as a peer-reviewed journal article.
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e67670
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Note-taking during learning has long been a mainstay of educational practice and data over the last 60 years, demonstrating its contribution to improved learning and test scores [1,2]. In 1995, a study on effective note-taking among students reported that free note-taking by learners was a particularly effective process [3]. A 2002 report noted that the most effective way for medical students to perform well was to take written notes on materials prepared in advance by the teachers [4].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e55087
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This led to the creation of 2 different scenarios for postpartum hemorrhage, a scenario for eclampsia, a scenario involving fetal distress with a ventouse delivery, and a breech delivery scenario. Both medical-technical and teamwork skills were included in the training, with the difficulty level increasing throughout the day. Every SHO participated in at least 2 scenarios during the 1-day training, while having an observer role in the nonparticipating scenarios.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e54911
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A pilot study with a quasi-experimental pre- and postintervention design will be implemented. As we will try to explore the participants’ characteristics, we want to conduct a pilot study to see the feasibility of this project among these participants. We plan to conduct quasi-experimental pre- and postintervention design, as we found in this setting randomization; case-control is rather difficult.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e71849
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Sociocentric study designs collect information about a “complete” network among members of a population or cohort of interest, whereas egocentric studies focus on the network of contacts that immediately surround a focal individual (ego) and often collect information from subgroups sampled from a larger population [1,9].
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e64497
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Next, we launched a nationwide Google Ad campaign. Advertisement-derived interest surveys identified potential participants who were then contacted by phone. Interest surveys reported the mode of recruitment through a single-choice answer of “a website,” “Facebook,” “Instagram,” “Google,” “referral,” or “other.” More detailed responses for choices like “other” were obtained through free response options. Referrals are defined as participants referred to the study by family, friends, or a physician.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63712
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Because if you say, “Well, I’m a woman, a teenager, a girl,” it would give you more tailored options, right?
Participants emphasized the importance of being heard, suggesting the platform should offer options for discussing MH with professionals via videoconference, call, or chat while also highlighting the need for both crisis support and follow-up care (annotations: 33/504, CF=6.5%).
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e66558
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Wearable Artificial Intelligence for Sleep Disorders: Scoping Review
To ensure a thorough and systematic approach, this scoping review adhered to the PRISMA-Sc R (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). A detailed account of adherence to PRISMA-Sc R guidelines is provided in Multimedia Appendix 1, outlining the structured process we followed.
A comprehensive search was conducted across several electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Psyc INFO, Embase, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65272
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Between March and July 2023, we sent recruitment packets randomly to 650 survivors representing three groups: (1) an active refusal group consisting of 230 survivors who had explicitly declined participation in the YFC parent study; (2) a passive refusal group consisting of 220 survivors whose mailing address was passively confirmed by the GCR (eg, a relative answered a call), yet who neither visited the study website nor explicitly declined participation; and (3) a lost group consisting of 200 survivors for
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64228
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS