Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Viewpoints and Opinions on Mental Health (54) Theory and Frameworks in Mental Health (47) Artificial Intelligence (2469) Public Health Policy (122) AI Governance and Policy (35)

Published on in Vol 12 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/84854, first published .
Gavel, scales of justice, and AI head sculpture symbolize legal tech and AI in law.

Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Services Under Illinois Public Act 104‐0054: Legal Boundaries and a Framework for Establishing Safe, Effective AI Tools

Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Services Under Illinois Public Act 104‐0054: Legal Boundaries and a Framework for Establishing Safe, Effective AI Tools

Authors of this article:

Daniel Szoke1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sarah Pridgen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Philip Held1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Szoke D, Hutzler I, Liu J, Addante S, Akhtar Z, Smith D, Dickins K, Small C, Pridgen S, Held P. Automated Safety Testing and Reporting Application for Conversational Safety Monitoring of Generative AI Tools for Mental Health: Development and Validation Study. JMIR Mental Health 2026;13:e91367 View
  2. Anderson T, Sinha M, Cohen I, Jones R. Ambient AI in Clinical Practice — The Legal Landscape of Recording Consent Requirements. NEJM AI 2026 View