Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mental Health Website for Adults With an Intellectual Disability: Qualitative Evaluation

Journals

1. Oudshoorn C, Frielink N, Nijs S, Embregts P. eHealth in the support of people with mild intellectual disability in daily life: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2020;33(6):1166 View
2. Vereenooghe L, Westermann K. Feasibility and Acceptability of an Interactive Mental Well-Being Intervention for People With Intellectual Disabilities: Pilot Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Formative Research 2019;3(4):e15190 View
3. Schoenberg N, Dunfee M, Yeager H, Rutledge M, Pfammatter A, Spring B. Rural Residents’ Perspectives on an mHealth or Personalized Health Coaching Intervention: Qualitative Study With Focus Groups and Key Informant Interviews. JMIR Formative Research 2021;5(2):e18853 View
4. Baldwin P, Rasmussen V, Trollor J, Zhao J, Anderson J, Christensen H, Boydell K. IDTWO: A Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Mental Health Intervention for Australians with Intellectual Disability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021;18(5):2473 View
5. Liem A, Pakingan K, Garabiles M, Sit H, Burchert S, Lam A, Hall B. Evaluating the Implementation of a Mental Health App for Overseas Filipino Workers in Macao China: A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders’ Perspectives. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2022;13 View
6. Apostolidis K, Mezaris V, Papadogiorgaki M, Bei E, Livanos G, Zervakis M. Content and Other Resources Recommendations for Individuals with Intellectual Disability: A Review. Electronics 2022;11(21):3472 View
7. MacHale R, Ffrench C, McGuire B. The experiences and views of adults with intellectual disabilities accessing digital mental health interventions: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2023;36(3):448 View
8. Thomas M, Henderson D, Trudel C, Thomas N. Usability of a Community-Based Dementia Resource Website: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Aging 2023;6:e40762 View
9. van Calis J, Bevelander K, van der Cruijsen A, Leusink G, Naaldenberg J. Toward Inclusive Approaches in the Design, Development, and Implementation of eHealth in the Intellectual Disability Sector: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e45819 View
10. Papadogiorgaki M, Grammalidis N, Grammatikopoulou A, Apostolidis K, Bei E, Grigoriadis K, Zafeiris S, Livanos G, Mezaris V, Zervakis M. An Integrated Support System for People with Intellectual Disability. Electronics 2023;12(18):3803 View
11. Ray S, Ryan B, Baldwin P, Thomas S, Kneebone I. Communicative accessibility and prospective acceptability of a digital behavioural activation intervention for people with aphasia. Aphasiology 2024;38(5):895 View
12. Savolainen K, Kujala S. Testing Two Online Symptom Checkers With Vulnerable Groups: Usability Study to Improve Cognitive Accessibility of eHealth Services. JMIR Human Factors 2024;11:e45275 View
13. Newby J, Upton E, Mason E, Black M. Technology-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Interventions. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2024;47(2):399 View
14. McLaren J, Hoang-Gia D, Dorisca E, Hartz S, Dang S, Moo L. Development and Evaluation of a Clinician-Vetted Dementia Caregiver Resources Website: Mixed Methods Approach. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e54168 View
15. Kärpänen T. Barriers to creating value with cognitive accessibility features in digital services. Universal Access in the Information Society 2024 View

Books/Policy Documents

1. Normand C, Gustavsson C, Alfredsson Ågren K, Heitplatz V, Chadwick D, Johansson S. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. View
2. Kärpänen T. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. View