Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Journal Description

JMIR Mental Health (JMH, ISSN 2368-7959, Editor-in-Chief: John Torous, MD, MBI, Harvard Medical School, USA, Impact Factor: 5.2) is a premier PubMed/PubMed CentralMEDLINESCIE (Science Citation Index Expanded)/WoS/JCR (Journal Citation Reports), EMBASE, Sherpa/Romeo, DOAJ, PsycINFO, ESCI, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials and Scopus indexed, peer-reviewed journal with a unique focus on digital health/digital psychiatry/digital psychology/e-mental health, covering Internet/mobile interventions, technologies and electronic innovations (software and hardware) for mental health, including addictions, online counselling and behaviour change. This includes formative evaluation and system descriptions, theoretical papers, review papers, viewpoint/vision papers, and rigorous evaluations related to digital psychiatry, e-mental health, and clinical informatics in psychiatry/psychology. In June 2023, JMH received an impact factor of 5.2

The main themes/topics covered by this journal can be found here.

JMIR Mental Health has an international author- and readership and welcomes submissions from around the world.

JMIR Mental Health features a rapid and thorough peer-review process, professional copyediting, professional production of PDF, XHTML, and XML proofs.

 

Recent Articles:

  • Source: Freepik; Copyright: freepik; URL: https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/young-adult-exercising-home_94965066.htm; License: Licensed by JMIR.

    Remote Short Sessions of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Monitored With Wearable Technology: Open-Label Prospective Feasibility Study

    Abstract:

    Background: Heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback is often performed with structured education, laboratory-based assessments, and practice sessions. It has been shown to improve psychological and physiological function across populations. However, a means to remotely use and monitor this approach would allow for wider use of this technique. Advancements in wearable and digital technology present an opportunity for the widespread application of this approach. Objective: The primary aim of the study was to determine the feasibility of fully remote, self-administered short sessions of HRV-directed biofeedback in a diverse population of health care workers (HCWs). The secondary aim was to determine whether a fully remote, HRV-directed biofeedback intervention significantly alters longitudinal HRV over the intervention period, as monitored by wearable devices. The tertiary aim was to estimate the impact of this intervention on metrics of psychological well-being. Methods: To determine whether remotely implemented short sessions of HRV biofeedback can improve autonomic metrics and psychological well-being, we enrolled HCWs across 7 hospitals in New York City in the United States. They downloaded our study app, watched brief educational videos about HRV biofeedback, and used a well-studied HRV biofeedback program remotely through their smartphone. HRV biofeedback sessions were used for 5 minutes per day for 5 weeks. HCWs were then followed for 12 weeks after the intervention period. Psychological measures were obtained over the study period, and they wore an Apple Watch for at least 7 weeks to monitor the circadian features of HRV. Results: In total, 127 HCWs were enrolled in the study. Overall, only 21 (16.5%) were at least 50% compliant with the HRV biofeedback intervention, representing a small portion of the total sample. This demonstrates that this study design does not feasibly result in adequate rates of compliance with the intervention. Numerical improvement in psychological metrics was observed over the 17-week study period, although it did not reach statistical significance (all P>.05). Using a mixed effect cosinor model, the mean midline-estimating statistic of rhythm (MESOR) of the circadian pattern of the SD of the interbeat interval of normal sinus beats (SDNN), an HRV metric, was observed to increase over the first 4 weeks of the biofeedback intervention in HCWs who were at least 50% compliant. Conclusions: In conclusion, we found that using brief remote HRV biofeedback sessions and monitoring its physiological effect using wearable devices, in the manner that the study was conducted, was not feasible. This is considering the low compliance rates with the study intervention. We found that remote short sessions of HRV biofeedback demonstrate potential promise in improving autonomic nervous function and warrant further study. Wearable devices can monitor the physiological effects of psychological interventions.

  • Immersive technologies for depression care. Source: Image created by the authors; Copyright: The authors; URL: https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e56056/; License: Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY).

    Immersive Technologies for Depression Care: Scoping Review

    Abstract:

    Background: Depression significantly impacts quality of life, affecting approximately 280 million people worldwide. However, only 16.5% of those affected receive treatment, indicating a substantial treatment gap. Immersive technologies (IMTs) such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality offer new avenues for treating depression by creating immersive environments for therapeutic interventions. Despite their potential, significant gaps exist in the current evidence regarding the design, implementation, and use of IMTs for depression care. Objective: We aim to map the available evidence on IMT interventions targeting depression treatment. Methods: This scoping review followed a methodological framework, and we systematically searched databases for studies on IMTs and depression. The focus was on randomized clinical trials involving adults and using IMTs. The selection and charting process involved multiple reviewers to minimize bias. Results: The search identified 16 peer-reviewed articles, predominantly from Europe (n=10, 63%), with a notable emphasis on Poland (n=9, 56%), which contributed to more than half of the articles. Most of the studies (9/16, 56%) were conducted between 2020 and 2021. Regarding participant demographics, of the 16 articles, 5 (31%) exclusively involved female participants, and 7 (44%) featured participants whose mean or median age was >60 years. Regarding technical aspects, all studies focused on VR, with most using stand-alone VR headsets (14/16, 88%), and interventions typically ranging from 2 to 8 weeks, predominantly in hospital settings (11/16, 69%). Only 2 (13%) of the 16 studies mentioned using a specific VR design framework in planning their interventions. The most frequently used therapeutic approach was Ericksonian psychotherapy, used in 56% (9/16) of the studies. Notably, none of the articles reported using an implementation framework or identified barriers and enablers to implementation. Conclusions: This scoping review highlights the growing interest in using IMTs, particularly VR, for depression treatment but emphasizes the need for more inclusive and comprehensive research. Future studies should explore varied therapeutic approaches and cost-effectiveness as well as the inclusion of augmented reality to fully realize the potential of IMTs in mental health care.

  • Source: Image created by the Authors / Placeit; Copyright: The Authors / Placeit; URL: https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e51791; License: Licensed by JMIR.

    A Web-Based and Mobile Intervention Program Using a Spaced Education Approach for Workplace Mental Health Literacy: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

    Abstract:

    Background: Workplace mental health is one of the global health concerns. Preventing mental health problems and promoting mental well-being in the workplace are important aspects of ensuring population health. This can be achieved by improving the mental health literacy of the public, particularly workers. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the purposely built mHealth platform as a health-related App. It also aims to examine the efficacy of a mHealth psychoeducation program on mental health literacy in the workplace. The main interest of this report is the immediate and medium-term effect of the program on the mental health literacy of workers. Methods: This phase III wait-listed cluster randomised controlled trial recruited 456 employees of specific industries with high levels of work-related stress. A separate sample of 70 individuals was used for the evaluation of the mHealth platform. The Australian National Mental Health Literacy and Stigma Survey and the Mobile Apps Rating Scale (MARS) were used to assess mental health literacy and to evaluate the App. For the trial and follow-up data, they were analysed by the Generalised Linear Latent And Mixed Model (GLLAMM) with adjustments for the clustering effect of work sites and repeated measures. Results: Evaluation of the mHealth program, using a sample of 70 respondents, resulted in average scores of the four major domains ranging from 3.8 to 4.2, with Engagement having the lowest score (s.d.=0.6). Of the 456 participants of the trial, 236 responded to the follow-up survey. Most MHL outcomes obtained significant results immediately after the intervention and across time. After adjusting for the clustering effect, the post-intervention weighted mean scores were significantly higher in the intervention group for correct recognition of a mental problem, help-seeking, and stigmatisation, in comparison to the controls with 0.2 (s.e.=0.1), 0.9 (s.e.=0.2), 1.8 (s.e.=0.4) respectively. There was a significant increase in help-seeking intention (P=0.014) and a reduction in stigmatisation and social distancing (P<0.001) at a 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: The mHealth platform is evaluated with satisfactory performance in terms of functionality, aesthetics, information content, and utility in enhancing mental health literacy. The psychoeducation intervention program, using this platform, has immediate and medium-term effects of retaining and improving mental health literacy. It is anticipated that ongoing development in Digital Health will provide great benefits in improving the mental health of the global population. Clinical Trial: The trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR, Registration number: ACTRN12619000464167).

  • Source: Image created by the Authors / Placeit; Copyright: The Authors / Placeit; URL: https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e53712/; License: Licensed by JMIR.

    Testing the Efficacy of a Brief, Self-Guided Mindfulness Ecological Momentary Intervention on Emotion Regulation and Self-Compassion in Social Anxiety...

    Abstract:

    Background: Theories propose that brief, mobile, self-guided mindfulness ecological momentary interventions (MEMIs) could enhance emotion regulation (ER) and self-compassion. Such changes are posited to be mechanisms of change. However, rigorous tests of these theories have not been conducted. Objective: In this assessor-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, we aimed to test these theories in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Methods: Participants with SAD (defined as having a prerandomization cut-off score ≥20 on the Social Phobia Inventory self-report) were randomized to a 14-day fully self-guided MEMI (96/191, 50.3%) or self-monitoring app (95/191, 49.7%) arm. They completed web-based self-reports of 6 clinical outcome measures at prerandomization, 15-day postintervention (administered the day after the intervention ended), and 1-month follow-up time points. ER and self-compassion were assessed at preintervention and 7-day midintervention time points. Multilevel modeling determined the efficacy of MEMI on ER and self-compassion domains from pretrial to midintervention time points. Bootstrapped parallel multilevel mediation analysis examined the mediating role of pretrial to midintervention ER and self-compassion domains on the efficacy of MEMI on 6 clinical outcomes. Results: Participants demonstrated strong compliance, with 78% (149/191) engaging in at least 80% of the MEMI and self-monitoring prompts. MEMI was more efficacious than the self-monitoring app in decreasing ER goal–directed behavior difficulties (between-group Cohen d=−0.24) and lack of emotional clarity (Cohen d=0.16) and increasing self-compassion social connectedness (Cohen d=0.19), nonidentification with emotions (Cohen d=0.16), and self-kindness (Cohen d=0.19) from pretrial to midintervention time points. The within-group effect sizes from pretrial to midintervention were larger in the MEMI arm than in the self-monitoring app arm (ER goal–directed behavior difficulties: Cohen d=−0.73 vs −0.29, lack of emotional clarity: Cohen d=−0.39 vs −0.21, self-compassion domains of social connectedness: Cohen d=0.45 vs 0.19, nonidentification with emotions: Cohen d=0.63 vs 0.48, and self-kindness: Cohen d=0.36 vs 0.10). Self-monitoring, but not MEMI, alleviated ER emotional awareness issues (between-group Cohen d=0.11 and within-group: Cohen d=−0.29 vs −0.13) and reduced self-compassion acknowledging shared human struggles (between-group Cohen d=0.26 and within-group: Cohen d=−0.23 vs 0.13). No ER and self-compassion domains were mediators of the effect of MEMI on SAD symptoms (P=.07-<.99), generalized anxiety symptoms (P=.16-.98), depression severity (P=.20-.94), repetitive negative thinking (P=.12-.96), and trait mindfulness (P=.18-.99) from pretrial to postintervention time points. Similar nonsignificant mediation effects emerged for all of these clinical outcomes from pretrial to 1-month follow-up time points (P=.11-.98). Conclusions: Brief, fully self-guided, mobile MEMIs efficaciously increased specific self-compassion domains and decreased ER difficulties associated with goal pursuit and clarity of emotions from pretrial to midintervention time points. Higher-intensity MEMIs may be required to pinpoint the specific change mechanisms in ER and self-compassion domains of SAD. Trial Registration: Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries; osf.io/m3kxz https://osf.io/m3kxz

  • Source: Freepik; Copyright: freepik; URL: https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/full-shot-woman-dealing-with-imposter-syndrome_38307055.htm; License: Licensed by JMIR.

    Time-Varying Network Models for the Temporal Dynamics of Depressive Symptomatology in Patients With Depressive Disorders: Secondary Analysis of Longitudinal...

    Abstract:

    Background: As depression is highly heterogenous, an increasing number of studies investigate person-specific associations of depressive symptoms in longitudinal data. However, most studies in this area of research conceptualize symptom interrelations to be static and time invariant, which may lead to important temporal features of the disorder being missed. Objective: To reveal the dynamic nature of depression, we aimed to use a recently developed technique to investigate whether and how associations among depressive symptoms change over time. Methods: Using daily data (mean length 274, SD 82 d) of 20 participants with depression, we modeled idiographic associations among depressive symptoms, rumination, sleep, and quantity and quality of social contacts as dynamic networks using time-varying vector autoregressive models. Results: The resulting models showed marked interindividual and intraindividual differences. For some participants, associations among variables changed in the span of some weeks, whereas they stayed stable over months for others. Our results further indicated nonstationarity in all participants. Conclusions: Idiographic symptom networks can provide insights into the temporal course of mental disorders and open new avenues of research for the study of the development and stability of psychopathological processes.

  • A visual abstract summarizing the key findings of the article titled “Examining the Efficacy of Extended Reality–Enhanced Behavioral Activation for Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial” published in JMIR Mental Health in 2024. The study found that extended reality–enhanced behavioral activation is as efficacious as traditional behavioral activation in treating symptoms of depression and can be used to reduce barriers to mental health treatment. Source: Image created by JMIR Publications/Authors; Copyright: JMIR Publications; URL: https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e52326; License: Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY).

    Examining the Efficacy of Extended Reality–Enhanced Behavioral Activation for Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Abstract:

    Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a global concern with increasing prevalence. While many evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) have been identified to treat MDD, there are numerous barriers to patients accessing them. Virtual reality (VR) has been used as a treatment enhancement for a variety of mental health disorders, but few studies have examined its clinical use in treating MDD. Behavioral activation (BA) is a simple yet effective and established first-line EBP for MDD that has the potential to be easily enhanced and adapted with VR technology. A previous report by our group explored the feasibility and acceptability of VR-enhanced BA in a small clinical proof-of-concept pilot. This study examines the clinical efficacy of a more immersive extended reality (XR)–enhanced BA (XR-BA) prototype. This is the first clinical efficacy test of an XR-BA protocol. Objective: This study examined whether XR-BA was feasible and efficacious in treating MDD in an ambulatory telemedicine clinic. Methods: A nonblinded between-subject randomized controlled trial compared XR-BA to traditional BA delivered via telehealth. The study used a previously established, brief 3-week, 4-session BA EBP intervention. The experimental XR-BA participants were directed to use a Meta Quest 2 (Reality Labs) VR headset to engage in simulated pleasant or mastery activities and were compared to a control arm, which used only real-life mastery or pleasant activities as between-session homework. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)–9 was the primary outcome measure. Independent-sample and paired-sample t tests (2-tailed) were used to determine statistical significance and confirmed using structural equation modeling. Results: Overall, 26 participants with MDD were randomized to receive either XR-BA (n=13, 50%) or traditional BA (n=13, 50%). The mean age of the 26 participants (n=6, 23% male; n=19, 73% female; n=1, 4% nonbinary or third gender) was 50.3 (SD 17.3) years. No adverse events were reported in either group, and no substantial differences in dropout rates or homework completion were observed. XR-BA was found to be statistically noninferior to traditional BA (t18.6=−0.28; P=.78). Both the XR-BA (t9=2.5; P=.04) and traditional BA (t10=2.3; P=.04) arms showed a statistically significant decrease in PHQ-9 and clinical severity from the beginning of session 1 to the beginning of session 4. There was a significant decrease in PHQ-8 to PHQ-9 scores between the phone intake and the beginning of session 1 for the XR-BA group (t11=2.6; P=.03) but not the traditional BA group (t11=1.4; P=.20). Conclusions: This study confirmed previous findings that XR-BA may be a feasible, non-inferior, and acceptable enhancement to traditional BA. Additionally, there was evidence that supports the potential of XR to enhance expectation or placebo effects. Further research is needed to examine the potential of XR to improve access, outcomes, and barriers to MDD care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05525390; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05525390

  • AI-generated image, using the prompt "Artificial Intelligence robot and Schwartz Values theory". Requestor: Zohar Elyoseph. Generator: DALL·E/OpenAI. Source: DALL·E/OpenAI; Copyright: N/A (AI-generated image); URL: https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e55988/; License: Public Domain (CC0).

    Assessing the Alignment of Large Language Models With Human Values for Mental Health Integration: Cross-Sectional Study Using Schwartz’s Theory of Basic...

    Abstract:

    Background: Large language models (LLMs) hold potential for mental health applications. However, their opaque alignment processes may embed biases that shape problematic perspectives. Evaluating the values embedded within LLMs that guide their decision-making have ethical importance. Schwartz’s theory of basic values (STBV) provides a framework for quantifying cultural value orientations and has shown utility for examining values in mental health contexts, including cultural, diagnostic, and therapist-client dynamics. Objective: This study aimed to (1) evaluate whether the STBV can measure value-like constructs within leading LLMs and (2) determine whether LLMs exhibit distinct value-like patterns from humans and each other. Methods: In total, 4 LLMs (Bard, Claude 2, Generative Pretrained Transformer [GPT]-3.5, GPT-4) were anthropomorphized and instructed to complete the Portrait Values Questionnaire—Revised (PVQ-RR) to assess value-like constructs. Their responses over 10 trials were analyzed for reliability and validity. To benchmark the LLMs’ value profiles, their results were compared to published data from a diverse sample of 53,472 individuals across 49 nations who had completed the PVQ-RR. This allowed us to assess whether the LLMs diverged from established human value patterns across cultural groups. Value profiles were also compared between models via statistical tests. Results: The PVQ-RR showed good reliability and validity for quantifying value-like infrastructure within the LLMs. However, substantial divergence emerged between the LLMs’ value profiles and population data. The models lacked consensus and exhibited distinct motivational biases, reflecting opaque alignment processes. For example, all models prioritized universalism and self-direction, while de-emphasizing achievement, power, and security relative to humans. Successful discriminant analysis differentiated the 4 LLMs’ distinct value profiles. Further examination found the biased value profiles strongly predicted the LLMs’ responses when presented with mental health dilemmas requiring choosing between opposing values. This provided further validation for the models embedding distinct motivational value-like constructs that shape their decision-making. Conclusions: This study leveraged the STBV to map the motivational value-like infrastructure underpinning leading LLMs. Although the study demonstrated the STBV can effectively characterize value-like infrastructure within LLMs, substantial divergence from human values raises ethical concerns about aligning these models with mental health applications. The biases toward certain cultural value sets pose risks if integrated without proper safeguards. For example, prioritizing universalism could promote unconditional acceptance even when clinically unwise. Furthermore, the differences between the LLMs underscore the need to standardize alignment processes to capture true cultural diversity. Thus, any responsible integration of LLMs into mental health care must account for their embedded biases and motivation mismatches to ensure equitable delivery across diverse populations. Achieving this will require transparency and refinement of alignment techniques to instill comprehensive human values.

  • Source: Image created by the Authors; Copyright: The Authors; URL: https://mental.jmir.org/2024/1/e53998/; License: Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY).

    Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Smartphone App–Led Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Under Therapist Supervision: Open...

    Abstract:

    Background: Major depressive disorder affects approximately 1 in 5 adults during their lifetime and is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Yet, a minority receive adequate treatment due to person-level (eg, geographical distance to providers) and systems-level (eg, shortage of trained providers) barriers. Digital tools could improve this treatment gap by reducing the time and frequency of therapy sessions needed for effective treatment through the provision of flexible, automated support. Objective: This study aimed to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical effect of Mindset for Depression, a deployment-ready 8-week smartphone-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) supported by brief teletherapy appointments with a therapist. Methods: This 8-week, single-arm open trial tested the Mindset for Depression app when combined with 8 brief (16-25 minutes) video conferencing visits with a licensed doctoral-level CBT therapist (n=28 participants). The app offers flexible, accessible psychoeducation, CBT skills practice, and support to patients as well as clinician guidance to promote sustained engagement, monitor safety, and tailor treatment to individual patient needs. To increase accessibility and thus generalizability, all study procedures were conducted remotely. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed via attrition, patient expectations and feedback, and treatment utilization. The primary clinical outcome measure was the clinician-rated Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, administered at pretreatment, midpoint, and posttreatment. Secondary measures of functional impairment and quality of life as well as maintenance of gains (3-month follow-up) were also collected. Results: Treatment credibility (week 4), expectancy (week 4), and satisfaction (week 8) were moderate to high, and attrition was low (n=2, 7%). Participants self-reported using the app or practicing (either on or off the app) the CBT skills taught in the app for a median of 50 (IQR 30-60; week 4) or 60 (IQR 30-90; week 8) minutes per week; participants accessed the app on an average 36.8 (SD 10.0) days and completed a median of 7 of 8 (IQR 6-8) steps by the week 8 assessment. The app was rated positively across domains of engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information. Participants’ depression severity scores decreased from an average Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score indicating moderate depression (mean 19.1, SD 5.0) at baseline to a week 8 mean score indicating mild depression (mean 10.8, SD 6.1; d=1.47; P<.001). Improvement was also observed for functional impairment and quality of life. Gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: The results show that Mindset for Depression is a feasible and acceptable treatment option for individuals with major depressive disorder. This smartphone-led treatment holds promise to be an efficacious, scalable, and cost-effective treatment option. The next steps include testing Mindset for Depression in a fully powered randomized controlled trial and real-world clinical settings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05386329; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05386329?term=NCT05386329

  • Source: Freepik; Copyright: freepik; URL: https://www.freepik.com/free-photo/person-cafe-enjoying-book_36294839.htm; License: Licensed by JMIR.

    Studies of Social Anxiety Using Ambulatory Assessment: Systematic Review

    Abstract:

    Background: There has been an increased interest in understanding social anxiety (SA) and SA disorder (SAD) antecedents and consequences as they occur in real time, resulting in a proliferation of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA). Despite the exponential growth of research in this area, these studies have not been synthesized yet. Objective: This review aimed to identify and describe the latest advances in the understanding of SA and SAD through the use of AA. Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. Results: A total of 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative synthesis of these studies showed that AA permitted the exploration of the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral dynamics associated with the experience of SA and SAD. In line with the available models of SA and SAD, emotion regulation, perseverative cognition, cognitive factors, substance use, and interactional patterns were the principal topics of the included studies. In addition, the incorporation of AA to study psychological interventions, multimodal assessment using sensors and biosensors, and transcultural differences were some of the identified emerging topics. Conclusions: AA constitutes a very powerful methodology to grasp SA from a complementary perspective to laboratory experiments and usual self-report measures, shedding light on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral antecedents and consequences of SA and the development and maintenance of SAD as a mental disorder.

  • Source: Adobe Stock; Copyright: melita; URL: https://tinyurl.com/mumpnbw2; License: Licensed by JMIR.

    Digital Tools to Facilitate the Detection and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: Key Developments and Future Directions

    Abstract:

    Bipolar disorder (BD) impacts over 40 million people around the world, often manifesting in early adulthood and substantially impacting the quality of life and functioning of individuals. Although early interventions are associated with a better prognosis, the early detection of BD is challenging given the high degree of similarity with other psychiatric conditions, including major depressive disorder, which corroborates the high rates of misdiagnosis. Further, BD has a chronic, relapsing course, and the majority of patients will go on to experience mood relapses despite pharmacological treatment. Digital technologies present promising results to augment early detection of symptoms and enhance BD treatment. In this editorial, we will discuss current findings on the use of digital technologies in the field of BD, while debating the challenges associated with their implementation in clinical practice and the future directions.

  • Source: The Authors (Orygen Communications); Copyright: Orygen; URL: https://www.orygen.org.au/Clinical-Care/Clinical-services/most/hellomost; License: Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY).

    A Novel Blended Transdiagnostic Intervention (eOrygen) for Youth Psychosis and Borderline Personality Disorder: Uncontrolled Single-Group Pilot Study

    Abstract:

    Background: Integrating innovative digital mental health interventions within specialist services is a promising strategy to address the shortcomings of both face-to-face and web-based mental health services. However, despite young people’s preferences and calls for integration of these services, current mental health services rarely offer blended models of care. Objective: This pilot study tested an integrated digital and face-to-face transdiagnostic intervention (eOrygen) as a blended model of care for youth psychosis and borderline personality disorder. The primary aim was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of eOrygen. The secondary aim was to assess pre-post changes in key clinical and psychosocial outcomes. An exploratory aim was to explore the barriers and facilitators identified by young people and clinicians in implementing a blended model of care into practice. Methods: A total of 33 young people (aged 15-25 years) and 18 clinicians were recruited over 4 months from two youth mental health services in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: (1) the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre, an early intervention service for first-episode psychosis; and (2) the Helping Young People Early Clinic, an early intervention service for borderline personality disorder. The feasibility, acceptability, and safety of eOrygen were evaluated via an uncontrolled single-group study. Repeated measures 2-tailed t tests assessed changes in clinical and psychosocial outcomes between before and after the intervention (3 months). Eight semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with the young people, and 3 focus groups, attended by 15 (83%) of the 18 clinicians, were conducted after the intervention. Results: eOrygen was found to be feasible, acceptable, and safe. Feasibility was established owing to a low refusal rate of 25% (15/59) and by exceeding our goal of young people recruited to the study per clinician. Acceptability was established because 93% (22/24) of the young people reported that they would recommend eOrygen to others, and safety was established because no adverse events or unlawful entries were recorded and there were no worsening of clinical and social outcome measures. Interviews with the young people identified facilitators to engagement such as peer support and personalized therapy content, as well as barriers such as low motivation, social anxiety, and privacy concerns. The clinician focus groups identified evidence-based content as an implementation facilitator, whereas a lack of familiarity with the platform was identified as a barrier owing to clinicians’ competing priorities, such as concerns related to risk and handling acute presentations, as well as the challenge of being understaffed. Conclusions: eOrygen as a blended transdiagnostic intervention has the potential to increase therapeutic continuity, engagement, alliance, and intensity. Future research will need to establish the effectiveness of blended models of care for young people with complex mental health conditions and determine how to optimize the implementation of such models into specialized services.

  • Source: Flickr; Copyright: Daniel Foster; URL: https://www.flickr.com/photos/17423713@N03/24669788776; License: Creative Commons Attribution + Noncommercial (CC-BY-NC).

    The Implementation of Recommender Systems for Mental Health Recovery Narratives: Evaluation of Use and Performance

    Abstract:

    Background: Recommender systems help narrow down a large range of items to a smaller, personalized set. NarraGive is a first-in-field hybrid recommender system for mental health recovery narratives, recommending narratives based on their content and narrator characteristics (using content-based filtering) and on narratives beneficially impacting other similar users (using collaborative filtering). NarraGive is integrated into the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) intervention, a web application providing access to the NEON Collection of recovery narratives. Objective: This study aims to analyze the 3 recommender system algorithms used in NarraGive to inform future interventions using recommender systems for lived experience narratives. Methods: Using a recently published framework for evaluating recommender systems to structure the analysis, we compared the content-based filtering algorithm and collaborative filtering algorithms by evaluating the accuracy (how close the predicted ratings are to the true ratings), precision (the proportion of the recommended narratives that are relevant), diversity (how diverse the recommended narratives are), coverage (the proportion of all available narratives that can be recommended), and unfairness (whether the algorithms produce less accurate predictions for disadvantaged participants) across gender and ethnicity. We used data from all participants in 2 parallel-group, waitlist control clinical trials of the NEON intervention (NEON trial: N=739; NEON for other [eg, nonpsychosis] mental health problems [NEON-O] trial: N=1023). Both trials included people with self-reported mental health problems who had and had not used statutory mental health services. In addition, NEON trial participants had experienced self-reported psychosis in the previous 5 years. Our evaluation used a database of Likert-scale narrative ratings provided by trial participants in response to validated narrative feedback questions. Results: Participants from the NEON and NEON-O trials provided 2288 and 1896 narrative ratings, respectively. Each rated narrative had a median of 3 ratings and 2 ratings, respectively. For the NEON trial, the content-based filtering algorithm performed better for coverage; the collaborative filtering algorithms performed better for accuracy, diversity, and unfairness across both gender and ethnicity; and neither algorithm performed better for precision. For the NEON-O trial, the content-based filtering algorithm did not perform better on any metric; the collaborative filtering algorithms performed better on accuracy and unfairness across both gender and ethnicity; and neither algorithm performed better for precision, diversity, or coverage. Conclusions: Clinical population may be associated with recommender system performance. Recommender systems are susceptible to a wide range of undesirable biases. Approaches to mitigating these include providing enough initial data for the recommender system (to prevent overfitting), ensuring that items can be accessed outside the recommender system (to prevent a feedback loop between accessed items and recommended items), and encouraging participants to provide feedback on every narrative they interact with (to prevent participants from only providing feedback when they have strong opinions).

Citing this Article

Right click to copy or hit: ctrl+c (cmd+c on mac)

Latest Submissions Open for Peer-Review:

View All Open Peer Review Articles
  • User engagement in clinical trials of digital mental health interventions: A systematic review.

    Date Submitted: Apr 23, 2024

    Open Peer Review Period: Apr 23, 2024 - Jun 18, 2024

    Background: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) overcome traditional barriers enabling wider access to mental health support and allowing individuals to manage their treatment. How individuals...

    Background: Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) overcome traditional barriers enabling wider access to mental health support and allowing individuals to manage their treatment. How individuals engage with DMHIs impacts the intervention effect. Objective: This review determined whether the impact of user engagement was assessed in the intervention effect in Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating DMHIs targeting common mental disorders (CMDs). Methods: This systematic review was registered on Prospero (CRD42021249503). RCTs published between 01/01/2016 and 17/09/2021 were included if evaluated DMHIs were delivered by app or website; targeted a CMD without comorbidity; and were self-guided. Databases searched: Medline; PsycInfo; Embase; and CENTRAL. All data was double extracted. A meta-analysis (MA) compared intervention effect estimates when accounting for engagement and when ignored. Results: We identified 184 articles randomising 43,529 participants. Interventions were delivered predominantly via websites (145, 78.8%) and 140 (76.1%) articles reported engagement data. All primary analyses adopted treatment policy strategies, ignoring engagement levels. Only 19 (10.3%) articles provided additional intervention effect estimates accounting for engagement: 2 (10.5%) conducted a complier-average-causal effect (CACE) analysis (principal stratum strategy) and 17 (89.5%) used a less-preferred per-protocol (PP) population excluding individuals failing to meet engagement criteria (estimand strategies unclear). MA for PP estimates, when accounting for engagement, changed the standardised effect to -0.18 95% CI (-0.32, -0.04) from -0.14 95% CI (-0.24, -0.03) and sample sizes reduced by 33% decreasing precision, whereas MA for CACE estimates were -0.19 95% CI (-0.42, 0.03) from -0.16 95% CI (-0.38, 0.06) with no sample size decrease and less impact on precision. Conclusions: Many articles report engagement metrics but few assessed the impact on the intervention effect missing opportunities to answer important patient centred questions for how well DMHIs work for different engagement levels. The majority that considered engagement in analysis used approaches most likely to induce bias.

  • Empowering Mental Health Monitoring: Macro-Micro Personalization Framework for Multimodal-Multitask Learning

    Date Submitted: Apr 14, 2024

    Open Peer Review Period: Apr 15, 2024 - Jun 10, 2024

    Background: The field of mental health technology presently has significant gaps that need addressing, particularly in the domain of daily monitoring and personalized assessments. Current non-invasive...

    Background: The field of mental health technology presently has significant gaps that need addressing, particularly in the domain of daily monitoring and personalized assessments. Current non-invasive devices like wristbands and smartphones are capable of collecting a wide range of data, which has not yet been fully utilized for mental health monitoring. Objective: The paper aims to introduce a novel dataset for Personalized Daily Mental Health Monitoring and a new Macro-Micro Framework. This framework is designed to employ multimodal and multitask learning strategies for improved personalization and prediction of emotional states in individuals. Methods: Data was collected from 242 individuals using wristbands and smartphones, capturing physiological signals, speech data, and self-annotated emotional states. The proposed framework combines macro-level emotion transformer embeddings with micro-level personalization layers specific to each user. It also introduces a dynamic restrained uncertainty weighting method to effectively integrate various data types for a balanced representation of emotional states. Several fusion techniques, personalization strategies, and multitask learning approaches were explored. Results: The proposed framework was evaluated using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC), resulting in a score of 0.503. This result demonstrates the framework's efficacy in predicting emotional states. Conclusions: The paper concludes that the proposed multimodal and multitask learning framework, which leverages transformer-based techniques and dynamic task weighting strategies, is superior for the personalized monitoring of mental health. The study indicates the potential of transforming daily mental health monitoring into a more personalized application, opening up new avenues for technology-based mental health interventions.

  • Mental Health Symptom Reporting to a Virtual Triage Engine Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Date Submitted: Apr 9, 2024

    Open Peer Review Period: Apr 9, 2024 - Jun 4, 2024

    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was an unexpected and large-scale event that impacted the lives of people globally. The pandemic was associated with an elevated prevalence of mental health problems...

    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was an unexpected and large-scale event that impacted the lives of people globally. The pandemic was associated with an elevated prevalence of mental health problems in the general public, including anxiety, depression, and psychological distress (1,2). A systematic literature review found that the prevalence of mental health disorders in diverse populations increased from 17% to 56% during the pandemic, with anxiety and depression reported most frequently (3). The effects of the pandemic on mental health likely manifested in various ways, with the degree of mental health challenges being related to the stage of the pandemic, as well as demographic factors, social factors, and previous mental health related factors (3,4). The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that in the first year of the pandemic alone, anxiety and depression increased globally by 25% (5). Objective: Examine patient-user symptom reporting to an AI-based online virtual triage (VT) and care referral engine to assess patterns of mental health symptoms (MHS) reporting prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Frequency of 11 MHS reported through VT was analyzed during three time intervals: one year prior to WHO declaring a global COVID-19 emergency; from pandemic declaration to a mid-point in US vaccine distribution/uptake; and one year thereafter. Results: A total 4,346,987 VT encounters/interviews presenting somatic and MHS occurred, increasing over time and peaking in the COVID-19 post-vaccine interval with 2,257,553 encounters (51.9%). In 866,218 encounters (19.9%), at least one MHS was reported. MHS reporting declined across subsequent time intervals, was lowest in the COVID-19 post-vaccine period (19.1%), and slightly higher in the pre-pandemic and COVID-19 pre-vaccine intervals (p=0.05). The most frequently reported symptoms were anxiety, sleep disorder, general anxiety, irritability and nervousness. Women reported anxiety less often and nervousness and irritability more often. Individuals aged 60+ years reported anxiety and nervousness less frequently, insomnia and sleep disorder more often than individuals 18-39 and 40-59 years old, and sleep disorder more often than those aged 40-59 years in all periods (all p=0.05). Conclusions: Overall VT usage for somatic and mental health symptom reporting and care referral increased dramatically during the pandemic. VT effectively screened and provided care referral for patient-users presenting with MHS. Virtual triage offers a valuable additional vehicle to detect mental health symptoms and potentially accelerate care referral for patients needing care.

  • Barriers and recommendations for implementing FAIR principles in child and adolescent mental health research

    Date Submitted: Apr 2, 2024

    Open Peer Review Period: Apr 2, 2024 - May 28, 2024

    Background: The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles are a guideline to improve the reusability of data. However, properly implementing these principles is challenging...

    Background: The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles are a guideline to improve the reusability of data. However, properly implementing these principles is challenging due to a wide range of barriers. Objective: To further the field of FAIR data, this study aimed to systematically identify barriers regarding implementing the FAIR principles in the area of child and adolescent mental health research, define the most challenging barriers, and provide recommendations for these barriers. Methods: Three sources were used as input to identify barriers: 1) evaluation of the implementation process of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) by three data managers, 2) interviews with experts on mental health research, reusable health data, and data quality, and 3) a rapid literature review. All barriers were categorized according to Type as described by Cabana et al. (1999), the affected FAIR principle, a category to add detail about the origin of the barrier, and whether a barrier was mental health specific. The barriers were assessed and ranked on impact with the data managers using the Delphi method. Results: Thirteen barriers were identified by the data managers, seven were identified by the experts, and 30 barriers were extracted from the literature. This resulted in 45 unique barriers with the following predominant outcomes: the external Type (n=32) (e.g., organizational policy preventing the use of required software); regarding all FAIR principles (n=15); the tooling Category (n=19) (i.e., software and databases); not mental health specific (n=43). Consensus on ranking the scores of the barriers was reached after two rounds of the Delphi method. The most important recommendations to overcome the barriers are adding a FAIR data steward to the research team, accessible step-by-step guides, and ensuring sustainable funding for the implementation and long-term use of FAIR data. Conclusions: By systematically listing these barriers and providing recommendations we intend to enhance the awareness of researchers and grant providers that making data FAIR demands specific expertise, available tooling, and proper investments.

  • Issues with online studies, an institutional example of a widespread challenge

    Date Submitted: Mar 15, 2024

    Open Peer Review Period: Mar 15, 2024 - May 10, 2024

    This paper reports on the growing issues experienced when conducting internet-based research. Non-genuine participants, repeat responders, and misrepresentation are common issues in health research po...

    This paper reports on the growing issues experienced when conducting internet-based research. Non-genuine participants, repeat responders, and misrepresentation are common issues in health research posing significant challenges to data integrity. A summary of existing data on the topic and the different impacts on studies is presented. Seven case studies experienced by different teams within our institutions are then reported, primarily focused on mental health research. Finally, strategies to combat these challenges are presented, including protocol development, transparent recruitment practices, and continuous data monitoring. These strategies and challenges impact the entire research cycle and need to be considered prior to, during and post data collection. With a lack of current clear guidelines on this topic, this report attempts to highlight considerations to be taken to minimise the impact of such challenges on researchers, studies and wider research. Researchers conducting online research must put mitigating strategies in place, and reporting on mitigation efforts should be mandatory in grant applications and publications to uphold the credibility of online research.

  • Detection and Characterization of Online Substance Use Discussion Among Gamers: A Retrospective Analysis of Reddit r/StopGaming Data

    Date Submitted: Mar 8, 2024

    Open Peer Review Period: Mar 8, 2024 - May 3, 2024

    Background: Video games have rapidly become mainstream in recent decades, with over half of the US population involved in some form of digital gaming. However, concerns regarding potential harmful eff...

    Background: Video games have rapidly become mainstream in recent decades, with over half of the US population involved in some form of digital gaming. However, concerns regarding potential harmful effects of excessive and disordered gaming have also risen. Internet gaming disorder (IGD) has been proposed as a tentative psychiatric disorder that requires further study by the APA and is recognized as a behavioral addiction by the WHO. Substance use among gamers has also become a concern, with caffeinated or energy drinks and prescription stimulants commonly used for performance enhancement. Objective: This study aimed to identify substance use patterns and health-related concerns among gamers. Methods: We used the public streaming Reddit API to collect and analyze all posts from the popular subreddit, r/stopgaming. From this corpus of posts, we filtered the dataset for keywords associated with common substances which may be used to enhance gaming performance. We then applied an inductive coding approach to characterize substance use behaviors, gaming genres, and physical and mental health concerns. Potential disordered gaming behavior was also identified using the tentative guidelines for IGD, as proposed by the APA. A Chi-Square Test of Independence was used to assess the association between gaming disorder and substance use characteristics, and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze whether mental health discussion or the mention of any substance with sufficient sample size was significantly associated with IGD. Results: 10,551 posts were collected from Reddit from 6/2017 – 12/2022. After filtering the dataset for substance-related keywords, a total of 1,057 were included for further analysis of which 286 mentioned both gaming and the use of one or more substances. Among posts that discussed both gaming and substance use, the most mentioned substances were alcohol (n=132), cannabis (n=104), and nicotine (n=48), while the most mentioned genres were role-playing-games (n=120), shooters (n=90), and multiplayer online battle arenas (n=43). Self-reported behavior that aligned with the tentative guidelines for IGD were identified in 191 (66.8%) posts. More than half, 62.9% (n=180), of posts discussed a health issue, with the majority of those posts (n=144) citing mental health concerns. Common mental health concerns discussed were depression and anxiety. There was a statistically significant association between IGD and substance use (p<0.001) based on a Chi Square test and there was a significantly increased odds of IGD among those who self-reported substance use (OR=2.20, p<0.001) as well as those who discussed mental health (OR=1.57, p<0.001). Conclusions: As gaming becomes more prevalent, better understanding of the interplay and convergence between disordered gaming, substance use, and negative health impacts can inform the development of interventions to mitigate risks and promote healthier gaming habits.