e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 157 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 39 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 37 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 22 JMIR Research Protocols
- 17 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 9 JMIR Formative Research
- 6 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 6 JMIR Serious Games
- 6 JMIRx Med
- 5 JMIR Human Factors
- 3 JMIR Cancer
- 2 Iproceedings
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Cardio
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The Importance of Telerehabilitation and Future Directions for the Field
Our research team recently completed a scoping review summarizing the published literature on adverse events during telerehabilitation; we determined from the 81 included studies, adverse events related to the delivery of telerehabilitation were rare, mostly characterized as mild or nonsevere [9].
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e76153
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Gamification in mHealth Apps for Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Scoping Review
With the use of digital health and telerehabilitation on the rise, the topic of m Health apps for physical therapy interventions is an emerging and important topic for clinicians. This scoping review seeks to map existing literature on the use of gamified mobile apps in physical rehabilitation in a home environment. Results will summarize research on gamified mobile apps to assist physical rehabilitation professionals with decision-making on remote interventions to enhance patient engagement and adherence.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e63600
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
During the COVID-19 pandemic, home telerehabilitation became a widely used strategy for OA rehabilitation, with patients guided remotely by therapists using telecommunication technology [13-15]. Internet-based interventions offer the potential to reach a broad audience at minimal or no cost, irrespective of geographical location, enabling exercise to be performed from the comfort and convenience of home, thereby mitigating some of the barriers to exercise reported in the OA population [16].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66037
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In previous years, the use of telerehabilitation (TR), also known as virtual rehabilitation, has rapidly increased [1-3]. TR is the branch of telehealth whose purpose is to remotely assess, monitor, or provide rehabilitation that best meets the patient’s needs [4]. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the public health system has been compelled to adjust its services in response to the emerging health crisis, which included making necessary changes in care delivery methods [4,5].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66639
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Ultimately, 6 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria, involving a total of 581 patients with KOA who received telerehabilitation intervention. The inclusion criteria required participants to be at least 18 years old, diagnosed with KOA, and undergoing telerehabilitation intervention.
Flow chart of the search and selection process.
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e72466
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Thank you for your reading of our article “A 4-Week Mobile App–Based Telerehabilitation Program vs Conventional In-Person Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Sarcopenia: Randomized Controlled Trial” [1]. We are truly gratified that our study has garnered your attention and interest and has sparked meaningful discussion. In response to the points raised by the authors [2], our answers are as follows.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73174
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Dear Editor:
We are writing to share our thoughts on the article “A 4-Week Mobile App–Based Telerehabilitation Program vs Conventional In-Person Rehabilitation in Older Adults With Sarcopenia: Randomized Controlled Trial” [1] published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research. This research presents a significant exploration into the rehabilitation of older adults with sarcopenia, comparing a mobile app–based telerehabilitation approach with traditional in-person rehabilitation.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71845
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
NIVIRT can be used as a form of asynchronous telerehabilitation, in which the therapy is done without the therapist being present, either in-person or virtually [6].
Telerehabilitation using NIVRT has been shown to be as good as conventional therapy for the rehabilitation of upper extremity deficits, activities of daily living, and postural balance after stroke [12-14].
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2025;12:e64729
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
From September 2022 to September 2023, a total of 47 patients in West China Hospital were enrolled in the study, with 40 (85%) individuals completing the trial (22 in the telerehabilitation group and 18 in the usual care group). Seven participants withdrew from the trial. One participant in the telerehabilitation group was diagnosed with asthma and the other 6 withdrew their consent because they were unable to come back to the hospital for examination on time due to living far away (Figure 2).
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e60115
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS