e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 30 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 8 JMIR Formative Research
- 6 JMIR Research Protocols
- 6 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Mental Health
- 1 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 1 JMIRx Med
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Transforming unstructured scale-related documents into computable and accessible knowledge systems, such as knowledge graphs, could help alleviate the burden on practitioners and promote MBC adoption [8].
The key to this transformation lies in accurately extracting scale-related knowledge entities from unstructured medical texts. However, several challenges complicate this task.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67033
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Altered mental status was defined as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
In March 2022, a “pre-commitment” strategy was implemented in our ED to encourage outpatient management of low-risk acute PE [21]. The e PESI was calculated in all patients in whom a CT-PE was ordered. In patients with e PESI
Image of the best practice alert presented to clinicians, depicting the Electronic Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (e PESI) score.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e58800
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In the third Delphi round, the appropriateness of the competencies was confirmed using a 5-point Likert scale, with all competencies scoring 4 or above, ensuring expert validity.
Asian Pac Isl Nurs J 2024;8:e67928
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Peer Review of “Development and Content Validity of the Handwashing Index (Preprint)”
This important qualifier could be done in places such as the name of the index itself (eg, handwashing [frequency] index), the abstract (eg, “There is no validated scale to measure [the frequency of] this habit”), and the conclusion (eg, “Interventions aimed at improving [the frequency of] handwashing in the global community”).
The cutoff point for item scoring appears too low, as a score of 4 is categorized as regular practice, despite the reported highest score being 20.
JMIRx Med 2024;5:e67587
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Self-report measures involve asking the person to rate his or her level of pain on a scale, such as the Visual Analog Scale or the Numeric Rating Scale [5]. A promising way of evaluating pain using drawings is known as the Pain Drawing Scale [6-10].
Digital technologies have had a significant influence on the evolution of pain drawings (PDs), with different applications in the field of medical apps [11].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e53119
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Step 1 involved a literature review to derive the initial scale items related to digital health literacy and digital health equity. Step 2 aimed to gain qualitative insights into the initial scale items by conducting focus group interviews (FGIs) with 6 patients with IBD and 6 experts, followed by an evaluation of the content validity of the initial scale items by 8 experts. Step 3 evaluated the validity and reliability of the final scale items quantitatively with 440 patients with IBD.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58497
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A Multidimensional Approach for Evaluating Reality in Social Media: Mixed Methods Study
Measures were given on a scale ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree, unless noted otherwise. On the basis of the findings from the focus groups and existing research, items were developed to measure the 5 aspects of social media reality judgments: falsity, naturality, authenticity, resonance, and social assurance. Multimedia Appendix 2 presents the full list of items, along with scale means, SDs, and reliability.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e52058
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
All items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1=none to 4=a lot. The instrument is available in Danish and has sufficient content validity. Data on other important measurement properties, for example, structural validity, are not yet available, indicating the need for further validation studies before the instrument can be used.
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e49903
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Participants were initially asked to respond on a scale regarding the variety of vegetables consumed in the past month. Following this, participants were asked to keep dietary records for 7 consecutive days starting the day after their responses for each scale.
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55795
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
There is also no scale for children younger than 12 years, apart from a scale on stigmatization [42] and another scale addressed only to children having a parent with mental illness [43]. Thus, a scale covering all 6 MHL dimensions addressed to primary school children (ages 9-11 years) does not exist so far. Only an attempt has been made by Bale et al [27], but the work has not been finished.
JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e51096
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS