Search Results (1 to 10 of 1413 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 382 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 264 JMIR Research Protocols
- 142 JMIR Formative Research
- 137 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 67 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 65 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 58 JMIR Dermatology
- 49 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 41 JMIR Human Factors
- 29 JMIR Mental Health
- 19 JMIR Aging
- 18 JMIR Cancer
- 18 JMIR Medical Education
- 18 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 16 JMIR Serious Games
- 12 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 11 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 10 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 10 JMIR Diabetes
- 9 JMIR Cardio
- 7 Iproceedings
- 7 JMIR AI
- 6 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 5 JMIR Infodemiology
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 2 JMIRx Med
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
Applications of Self-Driving Vehicles in an Aging Population
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66180
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Consumer-Grade Neurofeedback With Mindfulness Meditation: Meta-Analysis
We conducted 2 different approaches, trim-and-fill, which corrects for publication bias in small samples, and 3-parameter selection models which explicitly model the proportion of studies below a p-threshold. We considered applying p-curve approaches, but they require at least 3 significant findings which was not the case for multiple models.
A PRISMA flow diagram is shown in Figure 2 (PRISMA checklist provided in Multimedia Appendix 2).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68204
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Background characteristics of nursing home residents in both the experimental and control groups who completed the semistructured interviews after the 4-week intervention.
a Significance level set at P
b Chi-square test with Yates continuity correction.
c Not applicable.
d GDS: Global Deterioration Scale.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e56586
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The baseline compliance proportion was higher in the intervention clinics compared to the control clinics (difference: 3.32%, 95% CI 0.5%-6.2%; P=.02). Across all clinics, there was no significant change in compliance proportions from the baseline to the intervention period (difference: 1.29%, 95% CI: −1.6% to 4.2%; P=.37). The DID estimate, reflecting the interaction between intervention group and time period, was not statistically significant (difference: 0.07%, 95% CI −4.0% to 4.1%; P=.97).
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e70752
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The overall SURE test, saying “yes” to all 4 components, was 61.2% (156/255) for the standard group, 66.5% (145/218) for the visual group, and 67% (134/200) for the visual+VC group (visual vs standard, odds ratio [OR] 1.26, 95% CI 0.86‐1.84; P=.23; visual+VC vs standard, OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.87‐1.90; P=.20).
JMIR Cardio 2025;9:e67956
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Evaluating User Experience and Satisfaction in a Concussion Rehabilitation App: Usability Study
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67275
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
There was no significant effect of the study phase or incentives on any of the self-reported drinking outcomes, for the average number of days per week in the last month involving alcohol consumption (F2, 232=0.294, P=.75, η2=.003), typical weekend evening drink consumption in the last month (F2, 165=0.662, P=.52, η2=.008), the maximum number of drinks consumed in the last month (F2, 175=0.005, P=.99, η2=.00), or protective behavioral strategies (F2, 232=1.469, P=.23, η2=.013).
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e69873
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS