Search Results (1 to 10 of 2012 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 548 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 365 JMIR Research Protocols
- 234 JMIR Formative Research
- 148 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 105 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 81 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 80 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 78 JMIR Mental Health
- 45 JMIR Human Factors
- 43 JMIR Cancer
- 37 JMIR Dermatology
- 27 JMIR Medical Education
- 26 JMIR Aging
- 24 JMIR Cardio
- 24 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 21 JMIR Serious Games
- 20 JMIR Diabetes
- 18 Iproceedings
- 16 JMIR Infodemiology
- 13 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 12 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 9 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 8 JMIR AI
- 7 JMIRx Med
- 7 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 4 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 4 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 2 JMIR Nursing
- 2 JMIRx Bio
- 2 Medicine 2.0
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

(C) and (D) Performance of training on BIDMC data and testing on MGH data. AUPRC: area under the precision-recall curve; AUROC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; BIDMC: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; MGH: Mass General Hospital; PR: precision-recall; ROC: receiver operating characteristic.
Logistic regression coefficients from using the model trained with notes, ICDa codes, and medications. Unexpected results are discussed in the Error Analysis section.
JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e64113
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

There was no significant difference between groups in days between study visits (P values ranged from .72 to .07, and effect sizes were small; Cohen d=–0.09 to 0.29).
Among the 290 women eligible for follow-up, 249 (85.9%) provided follow-up data, including 96 (33.1%) with 6-month, 123 (42.4%) with 6- and 12-month, and 30 (10.3%) with 12-month data. Groups did not differ in participation at 6-month (χ21=3.5; P=.06; φ=0.11) or 12-month follow-up (χ21=0.0; P=.95; φ==0.004).
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66554
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Reference 42: How to obtain NNT from Cohen's d: comparison of two methods
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e68454
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS