TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bastien, Laurianne
AU  - Boke, Bilun Naz
AU  - Mettler, Jessica
AU  - Zito, Stephanie
AU  - Di Genova, Lina
AU  - Romano, Vera
AU  - Lewis, Stephen P
AU  - Whitley, Rob
AU  - Iyer, Srividya N
AU  - Heath, Nancy L
PY  - 2022
DA  - 2022/7/22
TI  - Peer-Presented Versus Mental Health Service Provider–Presented Mental Health Outreach Programs for University Students: Randomized Controlled Trial
JO  - JMIR Ment Health
SP  - e34168
VL  - 9
IS  - 7
KW  - web-based mental health outreach
KW  - resilience building
KW  - university student
KW  - peer-presented
KW  - mental health service provider–presented
KW  - mental health
KW  - outreach
KW  - resilience
KW  - student
KW  - service provider
KW  - randomized controlled trial
AB  - Background: University students are reporting concerning levels of mental health distress and challenges. University mental health service provider initiatives have been shown to be effective in supporting students’ mental health, but these services are often resource-intensive. Consequently, new approaches to service delivery, such as web-based and peer support initiatives, have emerged as cost-effective and efficient approaches to support university students. However, these approaches have not been sufficiently evaluated for effectiveness or acceptability in university student populations. Objective: Thus, the overarching goal of this study was to evaluate a mental health service provider–presented versus peer-presented web-based mental health resilience–building video outreach program against a wait-list comparison group. Methods: Participants were 217 undergraduate students (mean age 20.44, SD 1.98 years; 171/217, 78.8% women) who were randomly assigned to one of the intervention groups (mental health service provider–presented: 69/217, 31.8%; peer-presented: 73/217, 33.6%) or the wait-list comparison group (75/217, 34.6%). Participants in the intervention groups were asked to watch 3 brief skill-building videos addressing strategies for building mental health resilience, whereas the comparison group was wait-listed. The mental health service provider–presented and peer-presented video series were identical in content, with presenters using a script to ensure consistency across delivery methods, but the videos differed in that they were either presented by mental health service providers or university students (peers). All participants were asked to complete web-based self-report measures of stress, coping self-efficacy, social support, social connectedness, mindfulness, and quality of life at baseline (time 1), 6 weeks later (time 2, after the intervention), and 1-month follow-up (time 3). Results: Results from a series of 2-way ANOVAs found no significant differences in outcomes among any of the 3 groups. Surprisingly, a main effect of time revealed that all students improved on several well-being outcomes. In addition, results for program satisfaction revealed that both the mental health service provider–presented and peer-presented programs were rated very highly and at comparable levels. Conclusions: Thus, findings suggest that a web-based mental health resilience–building video outreach program may be acceptable for university students regardless of it being mental health service provider–presented or peer-presented. Furthermore, the overall increases in well-being across groups, which coincided with the onset and early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggest an unexpected pattern of response among university students to the early period of the pandemic. Limitations and barriers as well as research implications are discussed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05454592; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05454592 
SN  - 2368-7959
UR  - https://mental.jmir.org/2022/7/e34168
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/34168
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35762935
DO  - 10.2196/34168
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/34168
ER  -