%0 Journal Article %@ 2368-7959 %I JMIR Publications %V 4 %N 2 %P e16 %T Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Treat Emotional Distress After Stroke: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial %A Simblett,Sara K %A Yates,Matthew %A Wagner,Adam P %A Watson,Peter %A Gracey,Fergus %A Ring,Howard %A Bateman,Andrew %+ Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom, 44 2078480762, Sara.Simblett@kcl.ac.uk %K cognitive therapy %K technology %K stroke %K depression %K anxiety %D 2017 %7 31.05.2017 %9 Original Paper %J JMIR Ment Health %G English %X Background: Depression and anxiety are common complications following stroke. Symptoms could be treatable with psychological therapy, but there is little research on its efficacy. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate (1) the acceptability and feasibility of computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) to treat symptoms of depression and anxiety and (2) a trial design for comparing the efficacy of cCBT compared with an active comparator. Methods: Of the total 134 people screened for symptoms of depression and anxiety following stroke, 28 were cluster randomized in blocks with an allocation ratio 2:1 to cCBT (n=19) or an active comparator of computerized cognitive remediation therapy (cCRT, n=9). Qualitative and quantitative feedback was sought on the acceptability and feasibility of both interventions, alongside measuring levels of depression, anxiety, and activities of daily living before, immediately after, and 3 months post treatment. Results: Both cCBT and cCRT groups were rated as near equally useful (mean = 6.4 vs 6.5, d=0.05), while cCBT was somewhat less relevant (mean = 5.5 vs 6.5, d=0.45) but somewhat easier to use (mean = 7.0 vs 6.3, d=0.31). Participants tolerated randomization and dropout rates were comparable with similar trials, with only 3 participants discontinuing due to potential adverse effects; however, dropout was higher from the cCBT arm (7/19, 37% vs 1/9, 11% for cCRT). The trial design required small alterations and highlighted that future-related studies should control for participants receiving antidepressant medication, which significantly differed between groups (P=.05). Descriptive statistics of the proposed outcome measures and qualitative feedback about the cCBT intervention are reported. Conclusions: A pragmatic approach is required to deliver computerized interventions to accommodate individual needs. We report a preliminary investigation to inform the development of a full randomized controlled trial for testing the efficacy of computerized interventions for people with long-term neurological conditions such as stroke and conclude that this is a potentially promising way of improving accessibility of psychological support. %M 28566265 %R 10.2196/mental.6022 %U http://mental.jmir.org/2017/2/e16/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.6022 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566265